PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAI vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAI vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAI achieves a 32.45% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 41.86% return.


FAI

1D
4.39%
1M
5.49%
6M
34.12%
YTD
32.45%
1Y
48.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
41.61%

IDGT

1D
4.41%
1M
5.23%
6M
38.39%
YTD
41.86%
1Y
44.03%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
12.99%
ALL TIME*
5.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.29M$2.80M$3.60M
$4.62M$4.26M$7.95M

FAI vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FAI and IDGT is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.70

The correlation between FAI and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAI vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAI
FAI Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAI vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAIIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.61

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

8.49

-1.86

FAI vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAI and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAI vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAIIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-77.95%

+50.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-16.93%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.92%

-9.27%

+3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-19.85%

+14.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.26%

5.20%

+2.06%

Volatility

FAI vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a higher volatility of 10.83% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 7.94%. This indicates that FAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAIIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.83%

7.94%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.10%

19.20%

+5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.50%

22.77%

+6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.48%

23.56%

+7.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.48%

23.38%

+8.10%

FAI vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAI vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.76%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAI and IDGT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAI has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to IDGT (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAI dropped -27.82% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 48.02% vs 44.03% for IDGT. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 7.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 48.02% return vs 44.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

FAI is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while IDGT is Technology Equities. FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 0.39% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAI and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer