FAHDX vs. FLTMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FAHDX (Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A) and FLTMX (Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FAHDX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while FLTMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FAHDX returned 7.62%/yr vs 2.11%/yr for FLTMX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAHDX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for FLTMX.

Performance

FAHDX vs. FLTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A (FAHDX) and Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAHDX achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly higher than FLTMX's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FAHDX has outperformed FLTMX with an annualized return of 7.62%, while FLTMX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.11% annualized return.

FAHDX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 7.47%
• 6M: 7.79%
• 1Y: 16.28%
• 3Y*: 11.77%
• 5Y*: 6.33%
• 10Y*: 7.62%

FLTMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 1.35%
• 1Y: 5.72%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: 1.27%
• 10Y*: 2.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAHDX vs. FLTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAHDX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A	7.47%	11.79%	9.26%	12.00%	-11.37%	10.78%	8.72%	17.39%	-5.44%	11.40%
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund	0.90%	6.02%	1.19%	5.52%	-6.92%	0.83%	4.36%	6.34%	1.89%	4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FAHDX and FLTMX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1987	0.12

The correlation between FAHDX and FLTMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FAHDX vs. FLTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAHDX

FAHDX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FAHDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FAHDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FAHDX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FAHDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FAHDX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FLTMX

FLTMX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FLTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FLTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FLTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAHDX vs. FLTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A (FAHDX) and Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAHDX	FLTMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.54	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.02	3.90	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.67	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.16	1.93	+3.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.89	5.93	+14.96

FAHDX vs. FLTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAHDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the FLTMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAHDX and FLTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAHDX vs. FLTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAHDX drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, which is greater than FLTMX's maximum drawdown of -16.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHDX and FLTMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAHDX	FLTMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.43%	-16.13%	-32.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.15%	-2.97%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.00%	-3.88%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.29%	-10.91%	-4.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.43%	-10.91%	-17.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.09%	+1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-1.64%	-3.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.97%	-0.19%

Volatility

FAHDX vs. FLTMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A (FAHDX) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) at 0.66%. This indicates that FAHDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAHDX	FLTMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	0.66%	+1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.81%	1.81%	+3.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.82%	2.26%	+3.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.43%	3.05%	+3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.66%	3.23%	+4.43%

FAHDX vs. FLTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAHDX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTMX's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAHDX vs. FLTMX - Dividend Comparison

FAHDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than FLTMX's 2.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAHDX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A	4.11%	4.45%	3.95%	4.47%	6.87%	4.56%	3.47%	4.26%	5.72%	4.66%	5.28%	4.20%
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund	2.88%	3.70%	2.47%	2.42%	1.36%	1.67%	2.00%	2.39%	3.31%	2.64%	3.20%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAHDX and FLTMX in my portfolio?

FAHDX and FLTMX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAHDX or FLTMX?

FAHDX has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to FLTMX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAHDX dropped -48.43% vs FLTMX's -16.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAHDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.