FAGIX vs. XMHQ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FAGIX (Fidelity Capital & Income Fund) and XMHQ (Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF) are both funds - FAGIX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while XMHQ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. FAGIX is actively managed, while XMHQ is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAGIX returned 7.88%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for XMHQ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAGIX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XMHQ.

Performance

FAGIX vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAGIX achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGIX has underperformed XMHQ with an annualized return of 7.88%, while XMHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.

FAGIX

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 6.93%
• 6M: 7.48%
• 1Y: 16.45%
• 3Y*: 12.79%
• 5Y*: 6.79%
• 10Y*: 7.88%

XMHQ

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 8.05%
• 1Y: 12.57%
• 3Y*: 15.37%
• 5Y*: 9.12%
• 10Y*: 12.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAGIX vs. XMHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAGIX Fidelity Capital & Income Fund	6.93%	12.38%	10.69%	13.02%	-11.50%	11.13%	9.95%	18.96%	-7.17%	11.66%
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF	7.58%	4.71%	16.79%	29.51%	-12.42%	20.98%	26.61%	27.18%	-9.08%	15.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FAGIX and XMHQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2006	0.66

The correlation between FAGIX and XMHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAGIX vs. XMHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAGIX

FAGIX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FAGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FAGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FAGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FAGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FAGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

XMHQ

XMHQ Risk / Return Rank: 27
XMHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
XMHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
XMHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
XMHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
XMHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAGIX vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAGIX	XMHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	0.81	+1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	1.29	+2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.15	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.80	1.43	+3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.14	4.17	+15.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAGIX vs. XMHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the XMHQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGIX and XMHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAGIX	XMHQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	0.81	+1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.44	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.01	0.61	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.45	+0.43

Drawdowns

FAGIX vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAGIX drawdown since its inception was -37.97%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGIX and XMHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAGIX	XMHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.97%	-58.19%	+20.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.49%	-8.85%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.26%	-24.56%	+17.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.42%	-25.47%	+10.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.45%	-36.90%	+8.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-2.44%	+0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.98%	-9.28%	+2.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	3.02%	-2.19%

Volatility

FAGIX vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX) is 2.35%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that FAGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAGIX	XMHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.35%	4.06%	-1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.09%	11.28%	-6.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.25%	15.61%	-9.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.62%	20.76%	-14.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.83%	20.72%	-12.89%

FAGIX vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAGIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAGIX vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison

FAGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than XMHQ's 0.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAGIX Fidelity Capital & Income Fund	4.49%	4.74%	5.02%	5.28%	10.25%	6.08%	4.59%	5.00%	5.67%	5.05%	4.57%	4.51%
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF	0.56%	0.64%	5.20%	0.73%	1.72%	1.00%	1.12%	1.22%	1.59%	1.06%	1.63%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAGIX and XMHQ in my portfolio?

FAGIX and XMHQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAGIX or XMHQ?

XMHQ has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to FAGIX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAGIX dropped -37.97% vs XMHQ's -58.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.