FAGCX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
FAGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
FAGCX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGCX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | -9.48% | 22.47% | 39.06% | 45.51% | -32.60% | 16.63% | 74.20% | 47.51% | 19.08% | -6.23% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.81% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FAGCX having a -9.48% return and SWLGX slightly lower at -9.81%.
FAGCX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.70%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGCX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGCX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGCX
SWLGX
FAGCX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.83 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.35 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.17 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 4.02 | +1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.83 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.58 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.70 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGCX and SWLGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGCX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
FAGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than SWLGX's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | 4.05% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.34% | 14.14% | 7.31% | 7.69% | 14.30% | 8.00% | 15.78% | 16.11% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FAGCX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.09% | -32.69% | -36.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.10% | -16.16% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -32.69% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.10% | -13.03% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -7.13% | -11.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 4.69% | -0.23% |
Volatility
FAGCX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 6.73%. This indicates that FAGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 6.73% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 12.40% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 22.57% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 21.52% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 22.81% | +1.61% |