FAGCX vs. CMTFX

In the year-to-date period, FAGCX achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly higher than CMTFX's 2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX has underperformed CMTFX with an annualized return of 12.08%, while CMTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.80% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CMTFX's 0.92% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FAGCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the CMTFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGCX and CMTFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FAGCX nor CMTFX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -65.09%, roughly equal to the maximum CMTFX drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and CMTFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) have volatilities of 7.03% and 6.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.