FAGCX vs. CMTFX

In the year-to-date period, FAGCX achieves a -1.20% return, which is significantly lower than CMTFX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX has underperformed CMTFX with an annualized return of 10.81%, while CMTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.52% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CMTFX's 0.92% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FAGCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the CMTFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGCX and CMTFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FAGCX nor CMTFX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -65.09%, roughly equal to the maximum CMTFX drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and CMTFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) is 7.73%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that FAGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.