FAGCX vs. CMTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX).
FAGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. CMTFX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 8, 2000.
Performance
FAGCX vs. CMTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGCX vs. CMTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | -9.48% | 22.47% | 39.06% | 45.51% | -32.60% | 16.63% | 74.20% | 47.51% | 19.08% | 37.70% |
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | -6.05% | 25.10% | 31.72% | 56.85% | -34.63% | 23.04% | 49.65% | 44.21% | -1.26% | 43.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAGCX achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than CMTFX's -6.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX has outperformed CMTFX with an annualized return of 22.70%, while CMTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 21.08% annualized return.
FAGCX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.70%
CMTFX
- 1D
- 4.58%
- 1M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -6.05%
- 6M
- -4.98%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 26.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 21.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGCX vs. CMTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CMTFX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGCX vs. CMTFX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGCX
CMTFX
FAGCX vs. CMTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGCX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.86 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.26 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 2.34 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 8.20 | -2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGCX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.51 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.86 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.44 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGCX and CMTFX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGCX vs. CMTFX - Dividend Comparison
FAGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than CMTFX's 3.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | 4.05% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.34% | 14.14% | 7.31% | 7.69% | 14.30% | 8.00% | 15.78% | 16.11% |
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | 3.29% | 3.09% | 1.02% | 2.23% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 0.87% | 2.44% | 5.89% | 3.60% | 0.35% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
FAGCX vs. CMTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, roughly equal to the maximum CMTFX drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and CMTFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGCX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.09% | -68.28% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.10% | -14.35% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -39.42% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -39.42% | +0.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.10% | -10.42% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -16.39% | -2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 4.09% | +0.37% |
Volatility
FAGCX vs. CMTFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) have volatilities of 8.51% and 8.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGCX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 8.94% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 16.85% | -2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 27.32% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 25.88% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 24.70% | -0.28% |