FADTX vs. QQQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).
FADTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020.
Performance
FADTX vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FADTX vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FADTX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A | 0.00% | 24.35% | 35.02% | 59.29% | -36.17% | 27.26% | 11.39% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | -4.75% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Returns By Period
FADTX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- 24.28%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FADTX vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FADTX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FADTX vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
FADTX
QQQM
FADTX vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FADTX | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.64 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between FADTX and QQQM is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FADTX vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
FADTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.13%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FADTX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A | 11.13% | 11.13% | 8.01% | 3.94% | 3.72% | 12.63% | 7.85% | 2.52% | 23.98% | 8.23% | 1.63% | 4.55% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FADTX vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FADTX | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -7.86% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -8.47% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.44% | — |
Volatility
FADTX vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FADTX | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.45% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.24% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.26% | — |