FADTX vs. FKDNX

In the year-to-date period, FADTX achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than FKDNX's 5.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FADTX having a 13.53% annualized return and FKDNX not far ahead at 14.16%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FADTX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FADTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FADTX and FKDNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FADTX nor FKDNX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FADTX drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, which is greater than FKDNX's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FADTX and FKDNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) at 6.68%. This indicates that FADTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.