FACGX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FACGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FACGX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FACGX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACGX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C | -9.71% | 21.26% | 37.68% | 44.06% | -38.87% | 10.46% | 67.34% | 39.19% | 14.13% | 33.63% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FACGX achieves a -9.71% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FACGX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 18.32%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.14% annualized return.
FACGX
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- -9.71%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- 1Y
- 21.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 18.32%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FACGX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FACGX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FACGX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FACGX
VOO
FACGX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FACGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.01 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.53 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.55 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | 7.31 | -2.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FACGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.01 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.71 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.79 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.83 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between FACGX and VOO is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FACGX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FACGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACGX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C | 5.82% | 5.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 6.13% | 4.87% | 14.01% | 8.00% | 17.39% | 12.23% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FACGX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FACGX drawdown since its inception was -65.53%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACGX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FACGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.53% | -33.99% | -31.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.45% | -11.98% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.17% | -24.52% | -20.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.17% | -33.99% | -11.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -5.55% | -6.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -3.72% | -12.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 2.55% | +2.03% |
Volatility
FACGX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that FACGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FACGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 5.34% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 9.47% | +5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 18.11% | +6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 16.82% | +8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 17.99% | +5.84% |