PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FACDX vs. THW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FACDX vs. THW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACDX achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than THW's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FACDX has underperformed THW with an annualized return of 8.13%, while THW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.09% annualized return.


FACDX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
-6.28%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
8.13%

THW

1D
-2.15%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
0.57%
6M
2.45%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
6.83%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FACDX vs. THW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
-5.18%14.19%3.97%3.81%-13.07%11.25%21.07%27.89%7.20%24.09%
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
0.57%31.10%5.35%-11.52%-1.21%12.03%26.40%32.98%-5.40%16.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FACDX and THW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.61

The correlation between FACDX and THW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FACDX vs. THW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FACDX
FACDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FACDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FACDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

THW
THW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
THW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
THW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
THW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
THW Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FACDX vs. THW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FACDXTHWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.59

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

2.24

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.28

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.82

-1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.96

9.92

-6.96

FACDX vs. THW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the THW Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACDX and THW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FACDXTHWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.59

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.29

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.43

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.27

+0.29

Drawdowns

FACDX vs. THW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACDX drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than THW's maximum drawdown of -37.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACDX and THW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FACDXTHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-37.36%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-11.28%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-28.48%

+10.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.35%

-31.53%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.35%

-37.36%

+8.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.14%

-4.88%

-4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-9.71%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

3.20%

+1.73%

Volatility

FACDX vs. THW - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) have volatilities of 5.08% and 5.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FACDXTHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

5.05%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

13.17%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

20.02%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

18.65%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

21.20%

-2.42%

FACDX vs. THW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACDX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than THW's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

FACDX vs. THW - Dividend Comparison

FACDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.01%, more than THW's 11.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
14.01%13.28%12.33%0.00%0.00%6.24%5.94%0.32%5.08%0.00%0.00%6.66%
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
11.41%10.96%12.72%12.00%9.56%8.60%8.85%10.11%12.08%10.29%10.91%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FACDX and THW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FACDX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to THW (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACDX dropped -44.55% vs THW's -37.36%.

THW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FACDX and THW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer