THW vs. PPH
THW (abrdn World Healthcare Fund) and PPH (VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. THW is actively managed, while PPH is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, THW returned 9.83%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for PPH. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. THW charges 1.54%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PPH.
Performance
THW vs. PPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THW achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly higher than PPH's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, THW has outperformed PPH with an annualized return of 9.83%, while PPH has yielded a comparatively lower 8.33% annualized return.
THW
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 40.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
PPH
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
THW vs. PPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THW abrdn World Healthcare Fund | 4.83% | 31.10% | 5.35% | -11.52% | -1.21% | 12.03% | 26.40% | 32.98% | -5.40% | 16.95% |
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 1.11% | 22.00% | 8.05% | 6.95% | 2.64% | 17.79% | 5.49% | 19.39% | -5.89% | 15.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between THW and PPH is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015 | 0.58 |
The correlation between THW and PPH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THW vs. PPH — Risk / Return Rank
THW
PPH
THW vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THW | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 1.99 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 4.86 | +7.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THW vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THW drawdown since its inception was -37.36%, smaller than the maximum PPH drawdown of -51.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THW and PPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THW | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.36% | -51.45% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -10.76% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.37% | -18.06% | -10.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.53% | -20.26% | -11.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.36% | -29.70% | -7.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -6.61% | +5.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -17.29% | +7.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 4.40% | -1.23% |
Volatility
THW vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison
abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) have volatilities of 5.97% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THW | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 6.13% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 12.15% | +1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.19% | 17.61% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 15.15% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 17.01% | +4.20% |
THW vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
THW has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
THW vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison
THW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, more than PPH's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.08% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
THW abrdn World Healthcare Fund | 10.95% | 10.96% | 12.72% | 12.00% | 9.56% | 8.60% | 8.85% | 10.11% | 12.08% | 10.29% | 10.91% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THW and PPH have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPH has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to THW (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THW dropped -37.36% vs PPH's -51.45%.
THW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THW and PPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer