PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THW vs. PPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THW vs. PPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THW achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly higher than PPH's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, THW has outperformed PPH with an annualized return of 9.83%, while PPH has yielded a comparatively lower 8.33% annualized return.


THW

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
4.83%
6M
5.29%
1Y
40.30%
3Y*
8.02%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
9.83%

PPH

1D
0.92%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.61%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
8.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THW vs. PPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
4.83%31.10%5.35%-11.52%-1.21%12.03%26.40%32.98%-5.40%16.95%
PPH
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
1.11%22.00%8.05%6.95%2.64%17.79%5.49%19.39%-5.89%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between THW and PPH is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015

0.58

The correlation between THW and PPH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THW vs. PPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THW
THW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
THW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
THW Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
THW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
THW Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PPH
PPH Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPH Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPH Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THW vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THWPPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

1.99

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.73

4.86

+7.87

THW vs. PPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THW Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the PPH Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THW and PPH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THW vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THW drawdown since its inception was -37.36%, smaller than the maximum PPH drawdown of -51.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THW and PPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THWPPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.36%

-51.45%

+14.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-10.76%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.37%

-18.06%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.53%

-20.26%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.36%

-29.70%

-7.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-6.61%

+5.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-17.29%

+7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

4.40%

-1.23%

Volatility

THW vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison

abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) and VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) have volatilities of 5.97% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THWPPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

6.13%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

12.15%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.19%

17.61%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.70%

15.15%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

17.01%

+4.20%

THW vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

THW has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

THW vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison

THW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, more than PPH's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPH
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
2.08%1.78%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
10.95%10.96%12.72%12.00%9.56%8.60%8.85%10.11%12.08%10.29%10.91%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


THW and PPH have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPH has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to THW (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THW dropped -37.36% vs PPH's -51.45%.

THW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THW and PPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer