FABZX vs. JAAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX).
FABZX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Oct 10, 2013. JAAAX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jan 1, 2009.
Performance
FABZX vs. JAAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FABZX vs. JAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FABZX Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund | 1.44% | 8.48% | 11.60% | 2.86% | -7.86% | 2.85% | 7.36% | 7.42% | -2.18% | 6.85% |
JAAAX John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund | 2.10% | 6.18% | 6.59% | 5.85% | -3.12% | 4.77% | 4.36% | 8.95% | -4.09% | 6.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FABZX achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than JAAAX's 2.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FABZX having a 4.11% annualized return and JAAAX not far behind at 4.00%.
FABZX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 9.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.11%
JAAAX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 7.80%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FABZX vs. JAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FABZX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAAX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FABZX vs. JAAAX — Risk / Return Rank
FABZX
JAAAX
FABZX vs. JAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FABZX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 1.68 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.42 | 2.25 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.37 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 1.67 | +1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.75 | 8.43 | +6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FABZX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 1.68 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.98 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | 0.92 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.84 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FABZX and JAAAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FABZX vs. JAAAX - Dividend Comparison
FABZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than JAAAX's 1.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FABZX Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund | 6.92% | 7.02% | 11.80% | 0.70% | 3.10% | 4.90% | 0.80% | 0.90% | 2.33% | 1.56% | 0.77% | 1.89% |
JAAAX John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund | 1.50% | 1.53% | 1.17% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 1.72% | 0.74% | 3.38% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 0.77% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
FABZX vs. JAAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FABZX drawdown since its inception was -11.03%, smaller than the maximum JAAAX drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FABZX and JAAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FABZX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -15.72% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.45% | -4.43% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.03% | -6.28% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.03% | -12.64% | +1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -2.02% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -2.06% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.88% | -0.27% |
Volatility
FABZX vs. JAAAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) at 1.04%. This indicates that FABZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FABZX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 1.04% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 2.72% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99% | 4.72% | -0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 4.21% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 4.37% | -0.31% |