PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FABZX vs. BIMBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FABZX and BIMBX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

FABZX vs. BIMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.20%
1.53%
FABZX
BIMBX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FABZX:

0.39

BIMBX:

2.24

Sortino Ratio

FABZX:

0.53

BIMBX:

3.42

Omega Ratio

FABZX:

1.22

BIMBX:

1.44

Calmar Ratio

FABZX:

0.48

BIMBX:

2.94

Martin Ratio

FABZX:

1.38

BIMBX:

7.93

Ulcer Index

FABZX:

3.66%

BIMBX:

1.03%

Daily Std Dev

FABZX:

12.87%

BIMBX:

3.65%

Max Drawdown

FABZX:

-14.58%

BIMBX:

-8.73%

Current Drawdown

FABZX:

-9.62%

BIMBX:

-0.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FABZX achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than BIMBX's 2.28% return.


FABZX

YTD

1.09%

1M

-0.09%

6M

-0.20%

1Y

4.58%

5Y*

0.94%

10Y*

1.46%

BIMBX

YTD

2.28%

1M

1.57%

6M

1.52%

1Y

7.84%

5Y*

4.09%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FABZX vs. BIMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FABZX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMBX's 0.98% expense ratio.


FABZX
Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund
Expense ratio chart for FABZX: current value at 1.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.95%
Expense ratio chart for BIMBX: current value at 0.98% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.98%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FABZX vs. BIMBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FABZX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FABZX is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FABZX is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FABZX is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FABZX is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FABZX is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FABZX is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BIMBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIMBX is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIMBX is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIMBX is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIMBX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIMBX is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIMBX is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FABZX vs. BIMBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FABZX, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.392.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for FABZX, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.533.42
The chart of Omega ratio for FABZX, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.221.44
The chart of Calmar ratio for FABZX, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.482.94
The chart of Martin ratio for FABZX, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.387.93
FABZX
BIMBX

The current FABZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the BIMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FABZX and BIMBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.39
2.24
FABZX
BIMBX

Dividends

FABZX vs. BIMBX - Dividend Comparison

FABZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than BIMBX's 3.99% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FABZX
Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund
6.54%6.61%0.70%2.24%0.75%0.00%0.85%0.00%1.56%0.77%1.54%0.89%
BIMBX
BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I
3.99%4.08%4.47%4.90%1.72%1.70%4.19%3.02%2.18%1.70%1.23%0.00%

Drawdowns

FABZX vs. BIMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FABZX drawdown since its inception was -14.58%, which is greater than BIMBX's maximum drawdown of -8.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FABZX and BIMBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-9.62%
-0.17%
FABZX
BIMBX

Volatility

FABZX vs. BIMBX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) have volatilities of 1.16% and 1.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.16%
1.12%
FABZX
BIMBX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab