PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAB vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAB vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAB achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FAB has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 10.48%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


FAB

1D
0.47%
1M
0.35%
YTD
11.59%
6M
13.25%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
10.48%

VTV

1D
0.88%
1M
3.55%
YTD
12.28%
6M
14.14%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAB vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
11.59%9.86%7.82%15.81%-6.79%30.83%2.40%23.73%-14.62%14.62%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.28%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FAB and VTV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2007

0.83

The correlation between FAB and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAB vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAB
VTV

Financial Services

23.9%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
4.0%

Industrials

12.0%
14.0%

Energy

8.3%
8.1%

Technology

7.9%
13.4%

Real Estate

7.7%
2.8%

Healthcare

7.1%
14.5%

Utilities

6.2%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
9.4%

Basic Materials

3.9%
3.1%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.3%

Financial Services

FAB
23.9%
VTV
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FAB
13.9%
VTV
4.0%

Industrials

FAB
12.0%
VTV
14.0%

Energy

FAB
8.3%
VTV
8.1%

Technology

FAB
7.9%
VTV
13.4%

Real Estate

FAB
7.7%
VTV
2.8%

Healthcare

FAB
7.1%
VTV
14.5%

Utilities

FAB
6.2%
VTV
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

FAB
5.9%
VTV
9.4%

Basic Materials

FAB
3.9%
VTV
3.1%

Communication Services

FAB
2.7%
VTV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAB vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAB
FAB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAB vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FABVTVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

2.67

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

3.82

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.48

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

4.27

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.42

16.15

-2.74

FAB vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAB Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAB and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FABVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.67

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.82

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.51

-0.17

Drawdowns

FAB vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAB drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAB and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FABVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.29%

-59.27%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-6.35%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.91%

-14.52%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-17.04%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.08%

-36.78%

-10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-7.87%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.68%

+0.46%

Volatility

FAB vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that FAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FABVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

2.65%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

7.59%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

10.11%

+3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

13.88%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

16.67%

+5.39%

FAB vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAB has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAB vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

FAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.58%1.57%2.00%1.94%1.80%1.32%1.59%1.75%1.96%1.42%1.40%1.62%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAB and VTV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAB has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAB dropped -63.29% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 10.48% for FAB. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FAB.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.58% for FAB.

FAB is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. FAB tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FAB and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAB and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer