PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAB vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAB vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAB achieves a 20.06% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -5.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FAB has outperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 10.90%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.54% annualized return.


FAB

1D
0.86%
1M
3.54%
6M
13.45%
YTD
20.06%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
10.90%
ALL TIME*
8.47%

NFTY

1D
0.88%
1M
1.75%
6M
-5.04%
YTD
-5.08%
1Y
-1.61%
3Y*
6.43%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
7.54%
ALL TIME*
6.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.56M$3.08M$1.18M
$2.50M$1.73M$1.67M

FAB vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
20.06%9.86%7.82%15.81%-6.79%30.83%2.40%23.73%-14.62%14.62%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-5.08%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FAB and NFTY is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012

0.32

The correlation between FAB and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FAB vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAB
NFTY

Financial Services

24.3%
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%
16.2%

Industrials

10.5%
8.1%

Real Estate

8.7%

-

Energy

8.4%
7.9%

Healthcare

7.4%
10.2%

Technology

7.2%
9.7%

Utilities

7.1%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
8.0%

Basic Materials

3.5%
11.9%

Communication Services

3.1%
2.0%

Financial Services

FAB
24.3%
NFTY
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FAB
14.1%
NFTY
16.2%

Industrials

FAB
10.5%
NFTY
8.1%

Real Estate

FAB
8.7%
NFTY

-

Energy

FAB
8.4%
NFTY
7.9%

Healthcare

FAB
7.4%
NFTY
10.2%

Technology

FAB
7.2%
NFTY
9.7%

Utilities

FAB
7.1%
NFTY
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

FAB
5.7%
NFTY
8.0%

Basic Materials

FAB
3.5%
NFTY
11.9%

Communication Services

FAB
3.1%
NFTY
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAB vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAB
FAB Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAB vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FABNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.99

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

-0.10

+5.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.57

-0.23

+16.80

FAB vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAB Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAB and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAB vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAB drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, which is greater than NFTY's maximum drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAB and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FABNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.29%

-47.67%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-16.14%

+9.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.91%

-21.55%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-21.55%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.08%

-47.67%

+0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-13.23%

+12.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.18%

-9.65%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

6.99%

-4.98%

Volatility

FAB vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 3.57%. This indicates that FAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FABNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.57%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

12.74%

-4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

14.87%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

17.41%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

20.65%

+1.31%

FAB vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAB has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAB vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than NFTY's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.51%1.57%2.00%1.94%1.80%1.32%1.59%1.75%1.96%1.42%1.40%1.62%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.87%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAB and NFTY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAB has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to NFTY (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAB dropped -63.29% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, FAB leads with 10.90% vs 7.54% for NFTY. On fees, FAB is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FAB has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FAB is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.51% for FAB.

FAB is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while NFTY is India Equities. FAB tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FAB and 0.80% for NFTY.

FAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAB and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer