PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAB vs. DVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAB vs. DVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAB achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly higher than DVLU's 10.79% return.


FAB

1D
0.70%
1M
1.98%
YTD
12.76%
6M
12.00%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
11.08%

DVLU

1D
0.30%
1M
4.14%
YTD
10.79%
6M
8.85%
1Y
36.17%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAB vs. DVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
12.76%9.86%7.82%15.81%-6.79%30.83%2.40%23.73%-16.97%
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
10.79%23.67%13.36%18.84%-9.73%41.67%-6.68%33.59%-24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FAB and DVLU is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018

0.83

The correlation between FAB and DVLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAB vs. DVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAB
FAB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DVLU
DVLU Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAB vs. DVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FABDVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

2.97

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.40

10.71

+1.69

FAB vs. DVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the DVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAB and DVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAB vs. DVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAB drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, which is greater than DVLU's maximum drawdown of -53.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAB and DVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FABDVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.29%

-53.26%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-12.24%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.91%

-24.86%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-24.86%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.65%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.23%

-8.73%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

3.39%

-1.24%

Volatility

FAB vs. DVLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) is 3.30%, while First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that FAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FABDVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

3.70%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

12.34%

-3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.81%

16.43%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.67%

21.39%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.02%

25.73%

-3.71%

FAB vs. DVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAB has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than DVLU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAB vs. DVLU - Dividend Comparison

FAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than DVLU's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
0.62%0.73%1.06%1.34%2.18%1.33%1.34%1.71%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAB
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.56%1.57%2.00%1.94%1.80%1.32%1.59%1.75%1.96%1.42%1.40%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAB and DVLU have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVLU has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to FAB (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAB dropped -63.29% vs DVLU's -53.26%.

On 5-year performance, DVLU leads with 12.25% vs 8.97% for FAB. On fees, DVLU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FAB has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DVLU has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVLU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FAB.

FAB has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.62% for DVLU.

FAB is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DVLU is Momentum. FAB tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index, while DVLU tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FAB and 0.60% for DVLU.

DVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAB and DVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer