F vs. K
F (Ford Motor Company) and K (Kellogg Company) are both stocks. F operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while K operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
F vs. K - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
F
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- 22.47%
- YTD
- 16.24%
- 6M
- 17.05%
- 1Y
- 52.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 6.03%
K
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
F vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 16.24% | 42.35% | -13.10% | 10.18% | -42.18% | 137.48% | -3.88% | 29.64% | -34.35% | 8.73% |
K Kellogg Company | 0.00% | 5.99% | 49.75% | -7.44% | 14.35% | 7.44% | -6.78% | 26.08% | -13.32% | -4.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between F and K is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
F:
$60.66B
K:
$29.20B
F:
-$1.52
K:
$3.65
F:
0.32
K:
2.30
F:
1.62
K:
6.95
F:
$189.86B
K:
$12.67B
F:
$17.42B
K:
$4.41B
F:
$9.99B
K:
$2.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
F vs. K — Risk / Return Rank
F
K
F vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ford Motor Company (F) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| F | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| F | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | — | — |
Drawdowns
F vs. K - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| F | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.25% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.70% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | — | — |
Volatility
F vs. K - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| F | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.19% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.40% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.47% | — | — |
Dividends
F vs. K - Dividend Comparison
F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than K's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 4.03% | 5.72% | 7.88% | 4.92% | 4.30% | 0.48% | 1.71% | 6.45% | 9.54% | 5.20% | 7.01% | 4.26% |
K Kellogg Company | 1.39% | 2.76% | 2.79% | 10.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% | 3.66% | 3.27% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.74% |
Financials
F vs. K - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ford Motor Company and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
F vs. K - Profitability Comparison
F - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.
K - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.
F - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
K - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
F - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
K - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
F and K have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for F and K
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer