PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
F vs. K
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

F vs. K - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ford Motor Company (F) and Kellogg Company (K). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


F

1D
1.05%
1M
2.20%
6M
7.19%
YTD
12.50%
1Y
35.22%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
5.33%
ALL TIME*
5.55%

K

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$660.71M$696.44M$882.48M

F vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
F
Ford Motor Company
12.50%42.35%-13.10%10.18%-42.18%137.48%-3.88%29.64%-34.35%8.73%
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between F and K is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984

0.21

The correlation between F and K shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

F:

$56.38B

K:

$29.20B

EPS

F:

-$1.51

K:

$3.65

PS Ratio

F:

0.31

K:

2.30

PB Ratio

F:

1.57

K:

6.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

F:

$189.86B

K:

$12.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

F:

$17.42B

K:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

F:

$9.99B

K:

$2.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

F vs. K — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

F
F Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
F Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
F Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
F Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

K

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

F vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ford Motor Company (F) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

F vs. K - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

F vs. K - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.61%

Volatility

F vs. K - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.49%

Dividends

F vs. K - Dividend Comparison

F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, while K has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
F
Ford Motor Company
4.16%5.72%7.88%4.92%4.30%0.48%1.71%6.45%9.54%5.20%7.01%4.26%
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%

Financials

F vs. K - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ford Motor Company and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
43.25B
3.26B
(F) Total Revenue
(K) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

F vs. K - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ford Motor Company and Kellogg Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
18.4%
33.3%
Portfolio components
F - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

F - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

F - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


F and K have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for F and K

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer