EZU vs. EWN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EZU (iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF) and EWN (iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EZU tracks the MSCI EMU while EWN tracks the MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZU returned 9.96%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for EWN. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWN.

Performance

EZU vs. EWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZU achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than EWN's 19.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EZU has underperformed EWN with an annualized return of 9.96%, while EWN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.

EZU

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 3.97%
• YTD: 8.17%
• 6M: 11.21%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: 9.96%

EWN

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 8.51%
• YTD: 19.64%
• 6M: 20.94%
• 1Y: 34.72%
• 3Y*: 20.45%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: 12.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZU vs. EWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF	8.17%	40.00%	2.23%	23.44%	-17.25%	13.92%	7.62%	23.27%	-16.76%	27.89%
EWN iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF	19.64%	34.87%	1.67%	22.08%	-24.43%	22.74%	23.23%	32.45%	-15.37%	33.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EZU and EWN is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001	0.87

The correlation between EZU and EWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZU vs. EWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EZU	EWN
Financial Services	24.2%	18.1%
Industrials	21.3%	10.2%
Technology	14.6%	34.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	1.5%
Utilities	6.8%	-
Healthcare	5.8%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	11.5%
Energy	4.2%	2.1%
Basic Materials	4.1%	3.1%
Communication Services	4.1%	14.7%
Real Estate	1.0%	0.7%

Return for Risk

EZU vs. EWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZU

EZU Risk / Return Rank: 33
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 37

EWN

EWN Risk / Return Rank: 52
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZU vs. EWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZU	EWN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.78	-0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.54	-0.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.30	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	2.71	-1.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.88	10.25	-4.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZU vs. EWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the EWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZU and EWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZU	EWN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	1.78	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.40	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.61	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.31	-0.10

Drawdowns

EZU vs. EWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZU drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, roughly equal to the maximum EWN drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZU and EWN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZU	EWN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.32%	-65.22%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.06%	-13.24%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.02%	-19.77%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.11%	-43.57%	+7.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.37%	-43.57%	+2.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.24%	-16.35%	-2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	3.49%	+0.11%

Volatility

EZU vs. EWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) is 6.82%, while iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that EZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZU	EWN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.82%	7.50%	-0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.07%	16.31%	-2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.89%	19.64%	-2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.85%	22.88%	-3.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.49%	21.36%	-0.87%

EZU vs. EWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than EWN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZU vs. EWN - Dividend Comparison

EZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than EWN's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWN iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF	4.21%	5.03%	2.18%	1.79%	1.98%	1.01%	0.78%	2.57%	2.40%	1.68%	2.71%	1.92%
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF	2.64%	2.85%	2.90%	2.56%	2.79%	2.46%	2.13%	2.84%	3.47%	1.91%	3.07%	2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZU and EWN in my portfolio?

EZU and EWN have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZU or EWN?

EWN has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to EZU (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZU dropped -65.32% vs EWN's -65.22%.

Which ETF is better, EZU or EWN?

On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 12.94% vs 9.96% for EZU. On fees, EWN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EZU has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZU or EWN?

Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZU or EWN?

EWN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZU or EWN?

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.64% for EZU.

What is the main difference between EZU and EWN?

EZU tracks MSCI EMU, while EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EZU and 0.50% for EWN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.