EZRO vs. MATE
EZRO (AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZRO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.
Performance
EZRO vs. MATE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZRO achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than MATE's 14.21% return.
EZRO
- 1D
- -3.25%
- 1M
- -8.26%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 12.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZRO vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZRO AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF | 1.82% | 1.48% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 14.21% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZRO and MATE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZRO vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF (EZRO) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZRO vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZRO drawdown since its inception was -12.08%, smaller than the maximum MATE drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZRO and MATE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZRO | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.08% | -13.24% | +1.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.62% | -5.50% | -4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -3.35% | -0.57% |
Volatility
EZRO vs. MATE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZRO | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.94% | 23.25% | -2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 23.25% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 23.25% | -2.31% |
EZRO vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZRO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZRO vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZRO nor MATE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EZRO and MATE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MATE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MATE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EZRO.
EZRO and MATE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: AlphaDroid and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for EZRO and 0.97% for MATE.
Find the right allocation for EZRO and MATE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer