EZPZ vs. ETHV
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price while ETHV tracks the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -42.21% vs -37.87% for ETHV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHV.
Performance
EZPZ vs. ETHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly higher than ETHV's -47.05% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- -6.18%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV
- 1D
- -11.40%
- 1M
- -32.96%
- YTD
- -47.05%
- 6M
- -48.03%
- 1Y
- -37.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ vs. ETHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -34.43% | -10.23% |
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -47.05% | 7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and ETHV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.91 |
The correlation between EZPZ and ETHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. ETHV — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
ETHV
EZPZ vs. ETHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPZ | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.95 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.56 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | -0.99 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPZ | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | -0.55 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -0.48 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. ETHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum ETHV drawdown of -67.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and ETHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -67.54% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.78% | -67.54% | +11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.78% | -67.54% | +11.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | -32.78% | +10.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.82% | 38.18% | -7.36% |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. ETHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) is 10.69%, while VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) has a volatility of 14.46%. This indicates that EZPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 14.46% | -3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 46.45% | -9.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 69.27% | -22.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 72.63% | -24.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 72.63% | -24.77% |
EZPZ vs. ETHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. ETHV - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZPZ nor ETHV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EZPZ and ETHV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ETHV has higher volatility (14.46%) compared to EZPZ (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -55.78% vs ETHV's -67.54%.
On 1-year performance, ETHV leads with -37.87% vs -42.21% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHV has performed better with a -37.87% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ETHV.
EZPZ and ETHV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.20% for ETHV.
ETHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and ETHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer