EZPZ vs. CBXO
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - EZPZ is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. EZPZ is passively managed, while CBXO is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
EZPZ vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly lower than CBXO's -3.76% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- -6.18%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- -3.76%
- 6M
- -4.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -34.43% | -30.18% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.76% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and CBXO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
CBXO
EZPZ vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPZ | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPZ | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -2.36 | +1.65 |
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -11.47% | -44.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.78% | -11.47% | -44.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | -8.49% | -13.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.82% | — | — |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 7.18% | +40.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 7.18% | +40.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 7.18% | +40.68% |
EZPZ vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPZ and CBXO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXO.
CBXO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
EZPZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer