EZPZ vs. BFOC

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - EZPZ is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. EZPZ is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.

Performance

EZPZ vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.42% return.

EZPZ

• 1D: -6.18%
• 1M: -26.82%
• YTD: -34.43%
• 6M: -36.79%
• 1Y: -42.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFOC

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: -7.42%
• 6M: -8.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZPZ vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-34.43%	-27.74%
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	-7.42%	-9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPZ and BFOC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.89

Return for Risk

EZPZ vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZPZ vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZPZ	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.25	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZPZ	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	-1.87	+1.17

Drawdowns

EZPZ vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and BFOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZPZ	BFOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.78%	-18.22%	-37.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.78%	-18.22%	-37.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.92%	-12.59%	-9.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZPZ	BFOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.23%	12.53%	+34.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.86%	12.53%	+35.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.86%	12.53%	+35.33%

EZPZ vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZPZ vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither EZPZ nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZPZ and BFOC in my portfolio?

EZPZ and BFOC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EZPZ or BFOC?

On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZPZ or BFOC?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZPZ or BFOC?

EZPZ and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EZPZ and BFOC?

EZPZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.90% for BFOC.