EZMO vs. FMTM
EZMO (AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZMO charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
EZMO vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZMO achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.40% return.
EZMO
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMTM
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 31.40%
- 6M
- 33.68%
- 1Y
- 63.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZMO vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF | 1.61% | 5.20% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.40% | 7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZMO and FMTM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZMO vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
EZMO
FMTM
EZMO vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF (EZMO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 2.36 | -1.62 |
Drawdowns
EZMO vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZMO drawdown since its inception was -9.23%, smaller than the maximum FMTM drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZMO and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.23% | -12.12% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.93% | -0.26% | -7.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -1.88% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility
EZMO vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 22.83% | -7.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 22.91% | -7.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 22.91% | -7.74% |
EZMO vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZMO has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZMO vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
EZMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZMO and FMTM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for EZMO.
FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for EZMO.
Their fees differ too: 0.94% for EZMO and 0.45% for FMTM.
Find the right allocation for EZMO and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer