EZMAX vs. EIGMX

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

EZMAX (Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund) and EIGMX (Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund) are both mutual funds - EZMAX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EIGMX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, EZMAX returned 1.42%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for EIGMX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. EZMAX charges 1.41%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for EIGMX.

Performance

EZMAX vs. EIGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund (EZMAX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZMAX achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than EIGMX's 4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EZMAX has underperformed EIGMX with an annualized return of 1.42%, while EIGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.96% annualized return.

EZMAX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.22%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 4.47%
• 3Y*: 3.68%
• 5Y*: 1.17%
• 10Y*: 1.42%

EIGMX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 4.95%
• 6M: 4.95%
• 1Y: 11.69%
• 3Y*: 9.00%
• 5Y*: 6.33%
• 10Y*: 4.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZMAX vs. EIGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZMAX Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund	1.22%	4.72%	3.26%	3.09%	-5.73%	1.01%	1.33%	3.99%	1.41%	3.88%
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund	4.95%	11.37%	8.69%	6.99%	-0.47%	2.19%	3.59%	9.76%	-3.29%	4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EZMAX and EIGMX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2007	-0.02

The correlation between EZMAX and EIGMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EZMAX vs. EIGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZMAX

EZMAX Risk / Return Rank: 69
EZMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EZMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
EZMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EZMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
EZMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

EIGMX

EIGMX Risk / Return Rank: 99
EIGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EIGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EIGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EIGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
EIGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZMAX vs. EIGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund (EZMAX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZMAX	EIGMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	6.34	-3.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.81	10.11	-6.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	3.04	-1.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	8.23	-6.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.29	29.77	-23.48

EZMAX vs. EIGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is lower than the EIGMX Sharpe Ratio of 6.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZMAX and EIGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZMAX vs. EIGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZMAX drawdown since its inception was -9.90%, which is greater than EIGMX's maximum drawdown of -9.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZMAX and EIGMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZMAX	EIGMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.90%	-9.42%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.27%	-1.44%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.96%	-1.63%	-1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.34%	-7.39%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.34%	-9.42%	+1.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.00%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-0.92%	-0.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.71%	0.40%	+0.31%

Volatility

EZMAX vs. EIGMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund (EZMAX) is 0.36%, while Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) has a volatility of 0.47%. This indicates that EZMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZMAX	EIGMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.36%	0.47%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.50%	1.64%	-0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84%	1.87%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.18%	2.61%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.24%	2.50%	-0.26%

EZMAX vs. EIGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZMAX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than EIGMX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZMAX vs. EIGMX - Dividend Comparison

EZMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than EIGMX's 6.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund	6.66%	5.72%	6.16%	5.79%	4.78%	4.18%	4.37%	5.44%	3.72%	3.42%	4.02%	5.54%
EZMAX Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund	2.25%	2.88%	2.46%	1.62%	0.92%	0.39%	0.90%	1.52%	1.51%	1.36%	1.83%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZMAX and EIGMX in my portfolio?

EZMAX and EIGMX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZMAX or EIGMX?

EIGMX has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to EZMAX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZMAX dropped -9.90% vs EIGMX's -9.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.34 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.