EIGMX vs. KAMIX
EIGMX (Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund) and KAMIX (Kensington Managed Income Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, EIGMX returned 9.23%/yr vs 5.28%/yr for KAMIX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIGMX charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for KAMIX.
Performance
EIGMX vs. KAMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIGMX achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than KAMIX's 1.93% return.
EIGMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 5.41%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
KAMIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIGMX vs. KAMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund | 4.84% | 11.37% | 8.69% | 6.99% | 2.36% |
KAMIX Kensington Managed Income Fund | 1.93% | 4.32% | 4.38% | 3.96% | -2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIGMX and KAMIX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIGMX vs. KAMIX — Risk / Return Rank
EIGMX
KAMIX
EIGMX vs. KAMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) and Kensington Managed Income Fund (KAMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIGMX | KAMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.21 | 1.44 | +1.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.59 | 2.66 | +5.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.15 | 11.98 | +19.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIGMX vs. KAMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIGMX drawdown since its inception was -9.42%, which is greater than KAMIX's maximum drawdown of -6.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIGMX and KAMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIGMX | KAMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -6.11% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.44% | -2.55% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.63% | -4.35% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -2.13% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 0.57% | -0.17% |
Volatility
EIGMX vs. KAMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) is 0.44%, while Kensington Managed Income Fund (KAMIX) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that EIGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIGMX | KAMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 1.09% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | 2.57% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87% | 3.16% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.61% | 3.81% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.50% | 3.81% | -1.31% |
EIGMX vs. KAMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIGMX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than KAMIX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIGMX vs. KAMIX - Dividend Comparison
EIGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than KAMIX's 5.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund | 6.63% | 5.72% | 6.16% | 5.79% | 4.78% | 4.18% | 4.37% | 5.44% | 3.72% | 3.42% | 4.02% | 5.54% |
KAMIX Kensington Managed Income Fund | 5.59% | 4.57% | 5.60% | 4.15% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIGMX and KAMIX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KAMIX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to EIGMX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIGMX dropped -9.42% vs KAMIX's -6.11%.
EIGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.63 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIGMX and KAMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer