EZMAX vs. E

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund (EZMAX) and Eni S.p.A. (E).

EZMAX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Dec 7, 1993.

Performance

EZMAX vs. E - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund (EZMAX) and Eni S.p.A. (E). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EZMAX vs. E - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZMAX Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund	-0.37%	4.72%	3.26%	3.09%	-5.73%	1.01%	1.33%	3.99%	1.41%	3.88%
E Eni S.p.A.	46.33%	48.40%	-13.95%	26.73%	10.92%	43.12%	-28.73%	4.29%	-0.98%	7.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZMAX achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than E's 46.33% return. Over the past 10 years, EZMAX has underperformed E with an annualized return of 1.41%, while E has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.

EZMAX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: -0.37%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 3.34%
• 3Y*: 3.15%
• 5Y*: 1.01%
• 10Y*: 1.41%

E

• 1D: -3.06%
• 1M: 17.23%
• YTD: 46.33%
• 6M: 60.88%
• 1Y: 87.18%
• 3Y*: 33.52%
• 5Y*: 25.32%
• 10Y*: 13.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EZMAX vs. E — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZMAX

EZMAX Risk / Return Rank: 63
EZMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
EZMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
EZMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EZMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
EZMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

E

E Risk / Return Rank: 96
E Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
E Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
E Omega Ratio Rank: 97
E Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
E Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZMAX vs. E - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund (EZMAX) and Eni S.p.A. (E). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZMAX	E	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	3.57	-2.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	4.01	-2.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.60	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	4.61	-3.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.55	22.02	-16.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZMAX vs. E - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the E Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZMAX and E, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZMAX	E	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	3.57	-2.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	1.03	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.47	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.32	+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between EZMAX and E is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

EZMAX vs. E - Dividend Comparison

EZMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than E's 4.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EZMAX Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund	2.33%	2.88%	2.46%	1.62%	0.92%	0.39%	0.90%	1.52%	1.51%	1.36%	1.83%	1.87%
E Eni S.p.A.	4.24%	5.88%	7.69%	5.74%	6.38%	5.79%	5.91%	6.11%	5.15%	3.96%	3.98%	5.14%

Drawdowns

EZMAX vs. E - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZMAX drawdown since its inception was -9.90%, smaller than the maximum E drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZMAX and E.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZMAX	E	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.90%	-70.53%	+60.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.96%	-19.11%	+16.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.34%	-33.71%	+25.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.34%	-61.59%	+53.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-3.06%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-23.19%	+21.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	4.04%	-3.29%

Volatility

EZMAX vs. E - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Opportunities Fund (EZMAX) is 0.85%, while Eni S.p.A. (E) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that EZMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZMAX	E	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	8.16%	-7.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.26%	15.94%	-14.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.04%	24.53%	-21.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.14%	24.65%	-22.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.24%	28.22%	-25.98%