PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EIGMX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

EIGMX vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EIGMX (Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund) is Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, EIGMX returned 4.93%/yr vs 13.75%/yr for ^GSPC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EIGMX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIGMX achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 11.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EIGMX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 4.93%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.

EIGMX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.44%
YTD
4.15%
6M
5.18%
1Y
12.12%
3Y*
9.34%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
4.93%

^GSPC

1D
0.13%
1M
5.25%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIGMX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIGMX
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund		4.15%11.37%8.69%6.99%-0.47%2.19%3.59%9.76%-3.29%4.29%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index		11.16%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EIGMX and ^GSPC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2007

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund

S&P 500 Index

Often compared with EIGMX:
EIGMX vs. LSYIXEIGMX vs. KAMIXEIGMX vs. ASCIXEIGMX vs. AGGEIGMX vs. XBAL.TOEIGMX vs. DCAIXEIGMX vs. PRPFX
Often compared with ^GSPC:
^GSPC vs. ^IBEX^GSPC vs. AVGO^GSPC vs. SCHD^GSPC vs. TSMU^GSPC vs. GC=F^GSPC vs. QQQ^GSPC vs. ACWI

Return for Risk

EIGMX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EIGMX
EIGMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EIGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EIGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIGMX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EIGMX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.51

2.39

+4.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

10.40

3.25

+7.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.19

1.43

+1.76

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.31

3.16

+5.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.21

14.61

+15.60

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIGMX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIGMX Sharpe Ratio is 6.51, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIGMX and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EIGMX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.51

2.39

+4.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.40

0.75

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.98

0.76

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.47

+1.12

Drawdowns

EIGMX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIGMX drawdown since its inception was -9.42%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIGMX and ^GSPC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EIGMX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-56.78%

+47.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-9.10%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.63%

-18.90%

+17.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.39%

-25.43%

+18.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.42%

-33.92%

+24.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-10.72%

+9.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

1.97%

-1.57%

Volatility

EIGMX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) is 0.45%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that EIGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EIGMX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

2.84%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

8.98%

-7.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85%

11.87%

-10.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.61%

16.90%

-14.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.50%

18.07%

-15.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

EIGMX and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to EIGMX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIGMX dropped -9.42% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

EIGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.51 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIGMX and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer