EZM vs. VFMO
EZM (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index, while VFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard. EZM is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EZM returned 8.11%/yr vs 14.03%/yr for VFMO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
EZM vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 24.71% return.
EZM
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 24.71%
- 6M
- 22.49%
- 1Y
- 44.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.43%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- —
EZM vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund | 11.29% | 8.42% | 10.29% | 19.69% | -12.22% | 31.00% | 5.57% | 24.48% | -12.18% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 24.71% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 19.16% | 31.36% | 28.22% | -11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZM and VFMO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between EZM and VFMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EZM vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZM
VFMO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
EZM
VFMO
Industrials
EZM
VFMO
Consumer Cyclical
EZM
VFMO
Technology
EZM
VFMO
Healthcare
EZM
VFMO
Energy
EZM
VFMO
Consumer Defensive
EZM
VFMO
Real Estate
EZM
VFMO
Basic Materials
EZM
VFMO
Utilities
EZM
VFMO
Communication Services
EZM
VFMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZM vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
EZM
VFMO
EZM vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 4.09 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 15.46 | -5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.12 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.65 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.66 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
EZM vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.58% | -36.77% | -22.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.70% | -10.98% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.53% | -24.40% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.53% | -25.80% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -7.76% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.90% | -0.34% |
Volatility
EZM vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) is 3.33%, while Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that EZM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZM | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 6.05% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 16.38% | -6.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 21.21% | -6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 21.70% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 23.56% | -1.21% |
EZM vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZM vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than VFMO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund | 1.25% | 1.39% | 1.22% | 1.25% | 1.57% | 1.08% | 1.67% | 1.34% | 1.57% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.30% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.62% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZM and VFMO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMO has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to EZM (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs VFMO's -36.77%.
On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 14.03% vs 8.11% for EZM. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, EZM has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for EZM.
EZM has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.62% for VFMO.
EZM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VFMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.13% for VFMO.
VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZM and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer