EZM vs. SRHQ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EZM (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - EZM tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index while SRHQ tracks the SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EZM returned 15.45%/yr vs 17.23%/yr for SRHQ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.

Performance

EZM vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EZM having a 13.31% return and SRHQ slightly higher at 13.72%.

EZM

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 2.69%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 6M: 11.26%
• 1Y: 25.36%
• 3Y*: 15.45%
• 5Y*: 8.77%
• 10Y*: 11.70%

SRHQ

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 2.77%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 6M: 11.72%
• 1Y: 23.77%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZM vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund	13.31%	8.42%	10.29%	19.69%	3.54%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	13.72%	7.34%	16.49%	21.81%	5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EZM and SRHQ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2022	0.89

The correlation between EZM and SRHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZM vs. SRHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EZM	SRHQ
Financial Services	19.0%	8.9%
Industrials	16.4%	22.3%
Consumer Cyclical	15.2%	12.6%
Technology	13.6%	23.5%
Healthcare	9.9%	20.4%
Energy	6.4%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	5.3%
Real Estate	5.0%	1.1%
Basic Materials	4.4%	1.4%
Utilities	3.2%	1.3%
Communication Services	1.9%	2.2%

Return for Risk

EZM vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZM

EZM Risk / Return Rank: 61
EZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EZM Omega Ratio Rank: 54
EZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EZM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

SRHQ

SRHQ Risk / Return Rank: 63
SRHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
SRHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SRHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SRHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
SRHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZM vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZM	SRHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.62	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.33	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.28	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	3.79	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.93	12.88	-2.95

EZM vs. SRHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZM Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the SRHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZM and SRHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZM vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than SRHQ's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and SRHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZM	SRHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.58%	-18.50%	-41.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.70%	-6.31%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.53%	-18.50%	-5.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.22%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.25%	-3.04%	-5.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	1.85%	+0.71%

Volatility

EZM vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) have volatilities of 3.89% and 3.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZM	SRHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	3.85%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	10.80%	-0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.04%	14.76%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.40%	15.98%	+4.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.32%	15.98%	+6.34%

EZM vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZM vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison

EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than SRHQ's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund	1.22%	1.39%	1.22%	1.25%	1.57%	1.08%	1.67%	1.34%	1.57%	1.14%	1.55%	1.30%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	0.90%	0.76%	0.66%	0.84%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZM and SRHQ in my portfolio?

EZM and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZM or SRHQ?

EZM has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to SRHQ (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs SRHQ's -18.50%.

Which ETF is better, EZM or SRHQ?

On 3-year performance, SRHQ leads with 17.23% vs 15.45% for EZM. On fees, SRHQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZM or SRHQ?

Over the 3-year period, SRHQ has performed better with a 17.23% return vs 15.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZM or SRHQ?

SRHQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for EZM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZM or SRHQ?

EZM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.90% for SRHQ.

What is the main difference between EZM and SRHQ?

EZM tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index, while SRHQ tracks SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.35% for SRHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.