EZM vs. FLDZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EZM (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund) and FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. EZM is passively managed, while FLDZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EZM returned 16.06%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for FLDZ. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FLDZ.

Performance

EZM vs. FLDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than FLDZ's 5.31% return.

EZM

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 6M: 11.02%
• 1Y: 24.69%
• 3Y*: 16.06%
• 5Y*: 8.11%
• 10Y*: 10.61%

FLDZ

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 5.31%
• 6M: 4.18%
• 1Y: 9.60%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZM vs. FLDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund	11.29%	8.42%	10.29%	19.69%	-12.72%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	5.31%	6.66%	15.99%	12.15%	-11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EZM and FLDZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2022	0.94

The correlation between EZM and FLDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZM vs. FLDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EZM	FLDZ
Financial Services	19.3%	15.1%
Industrials	16.5%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	15.4%	14.8%
Technology	12.5%	3.4%
Healthcare	9.2%	11.7%
Energy	7.2%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	4.8%
Real Estate	4.9%	8.3%
Basic Materials	4.4%	1.6%
Utilities	3.3%	11.9%
Communication Services	1.8%	4.6%

Return for Risk

EZM vs. FLDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZM

EZM Risk / Return Rank: 53
EZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
EZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
EZM Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
EZM Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 27
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZM vs. FLDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZM	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	0.85	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	1.29	+1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.15	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	1.54	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.66	4.70	+4.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZM vs. FLDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZM Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the FLDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZM and FLDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZM	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	0.85	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.35	+0.06

Drawdowns

EZM vs. FLDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than FLDZ's maximum drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and FLDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZM	FLDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.58%	-19.54%	-40.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.70%	-6.25%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.53%	-17.43%	-6.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.78%	+0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-5.98%	-2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	2.05%	+0.51%

Volatility

EZM vs. FLDZ - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) at 2.67%. This indicates that EZM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZM	FLDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	2.67%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.25%	7.66%	+2.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.84%	11.32%	+3.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.42%	16.91%	+3.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.35%	16.91%	+5.44%

EZM vs. FLDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDZ's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZM vs. FLDZ - Dividend Comparison

EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than FLDZ's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund	1.25%	1.39%	1.22%	1.25%	1.57%	1.08%	1.67%	1.34%	1.57%	1.14%	1.55%	1.30%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.46%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZM and FLDZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, EZM and FLDZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EZM or FLDZ?

EZM has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FLDZ (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs FLDZ's -19.54%.

Which ETF is better, EZM or FLDZ?

On 3-year performance, EZM leads with 16.06% vs 13.62% for FLDZ. On fees, EZM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FLDZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZM or FLDZ?

Over the 3-year period, EZM has performed better with a 16.06% return vs 13.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZM or FLDZ?

EZM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZM or FLDZ?

FLDZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.25% for EZM.

What is the main difference between EZM and FLDZ?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.