PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZJ vs. UCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZJ vs. UCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 24.65% return, which is significantly higher than UCC's -8.62% return. Over the past 10 years, EZJ has underperformed UCC with an annualized return of 11.13%, while UCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.


EZJ

1D
1.04%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
24.65%
6M
23.79%
1Y
53.47%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
11.13%

UCC

1D
0.57%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-8.62%
6M
-10.29%
1Y
10.10%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZJ vs. UCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
24.65%42.72%3.31%30.78%-38.23%-1.96%22.21%33.76%-30.99%49.10%
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services
-8.62%2.21%44.24%61.67%-57.59%20.92%46.55%53.76%-4.94%42.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EZJ and UCC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009

0.51

The correlation between EZJ and UCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZJ vs. UCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZJ
EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

UCC
UCC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZJ vs. UCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EZJUCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.08

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

0.35

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

0.97

+5.09

EZJ vs. UCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the UCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZJ and UCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EZJ vs. UCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum UCC drawdown of -83.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and UCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZJUCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-83.05%

+24.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.78%

-29.14%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-48.01%

+16.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.63%

-61.77%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

-61.77%

+3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.32%

-18.41%

+11.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.26%

-21.80%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.86%

10.45%

-1.59%

Volatility

EZJ vs. UCC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) have volatilities of 12.82% and 12.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZJUCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.82%

12.41%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.61%

27.05%

+5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.13%

36.41%

+4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.89%

43.70%

-6.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.65%

40.68%

-6.03%

EZJ vs. UCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EZJ and UCC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

EZJ vs. UCC - Dividend Comparison

EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than UCC's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
1.66%1.13%2.09%1.11%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.24%4.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services
1.18%1.10%0.17%0.04%0.25%0.00%0.02%0.17%0.18%0.14%0.21%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZJ and UCC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZJ has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to UCC (12.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs UCC's -83.05%.

On 10-year performance, UCC leads with 13.99% vs 11.13% for EZJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UCC has been the lower-risk option at 12.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UCC has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 11.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZJ and UCC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.18% for UCC.

EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%).

EZJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZJ and UCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer