EZJ vs. BITU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZJ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (200%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZJ returned 58.99% vs -73.89% for BITU. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

EZJ vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 29.29% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -55.56% return.

EZJ

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 10.56%
• YTD: 29.29%
• 6M: 28.96%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 26.09%
• 5Y*: 7.76%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

BITU

• 1D: -5.61%
• 1M: -40.78%
• YTD: -55.56%
• 6M: -61.06%
• 1Y: -73.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZJ vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan	29.29%	42.72%	-11.31%
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	-55.56%	-37.07%	37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EZJ and BITU is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024	0.25

EZJ vs. BITU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EZJ	BITU
Industrials	26.0%	-
Technology	19.1%	-
Financial Services	17.6%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	-
Communication Services	7.9%	-
Healthcare	6.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	3.0%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Energy	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

EZJ vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZJ

EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 43
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

BITU

BITU Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZJ vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZJ	BITU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	-0.85	+2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	-1.48	+3.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.84	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	-0.92	+3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	-1.48	+8.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZJ vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZJ and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZJ	BITU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	-0.85	+2.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	-0.37	+0.60

Drawdowns

EZJ vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -80.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and BITU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZJ	BITU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.63%	-80.13%	+21.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.78%	-80.13%	+53.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.87%	-80.13%	+76.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.28%	-34.58%	+13.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.72%	50.09%	-41.37%

Volatility

EZJ vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) is 8.46%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.31%. This indicates that EZJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZJ	BITU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.46%	18.31%	-9.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.74%	68.43%	-37.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.67%	87.07%	-47.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.58%	97.43%	-60.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.53%	97.43%	-62.90%

EZJ vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EZJ and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

EZJ vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than BITU's 88.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	88.31%	50.23%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan	1.60%	1.13%	2.09%	1.11%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZJ and BITU in my portfolio?

EZJ and BITU have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZJ or BITU?

BITU has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to EZJ (8.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs BITU's -80.13%.

Which ETF is better, EZJ or BITU?

On 1-year performance, EZJ leads with 58.99% vs -73.89% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EZJ has been the lower-risk option at 8.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZJ or BITU?

Over the 1-year period, EZJ has performed better with a 58.99% return vs -73.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZJ or BITU?

EZJ and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZJ or BITU?

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 88.31%, compared with 1.60% for EZJ.

What is the main difference between EZJ and BITU?

EZJ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.