EZJ vs. BITU
EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZJ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (200%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZJ returned 62.45% vs -78.69% for BITU. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EZJ vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 27.24% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -62.35% return.
EZJ
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 27.24%
- 6M
- 26.38%
- 1Y
- 62.45%
- 3Y*
- 26.61%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
BITU
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -41.19%
- YTD
- -62.35%
- 6M
- -62.22%
- 1Y
- -78.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZJ vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 27.24% | 42.72% | -12.04% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -62.35% | -37.07% | 41.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZJ and BITU is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZJ vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
EZJ
BITU
EZJ vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZJ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.81 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | -0.95 | +3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.04 | -1.47 | +8.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZJ vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZJ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -83.16% | +24.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -83.16% | +56.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.74% | -83.16% | +75.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.23% | -35.67% | +14.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 53.56% | -44.66% |
Volatility
EZJ vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) is 16.40%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 26.62%. This indicates that EZJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZJ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.40% | 26.62% | -10.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.13% | 69.77% | -35.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.14% | 88.34% | -46.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.14% | 97.36% | -60.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.74% | 97.36% | -62.62% |
EZJ vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EZJ and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EZJ vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than BITU's 104.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 104.24% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.87% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZJ and BITU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITU has higher volatility (26.62%) compared to EZJ (16.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs BITU's -83.16%.
On 1-year performance, EZJ leads with 62.45% vs -78.69% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EZJ has been the lower-risk option at 16.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EZJ has performed better with a 62.45% return vs -78.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZJ and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 104.24%, compared with 1.87% for EZJ.
EZJ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
EZJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZJ and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer