EZET vs. NFXS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - EZET is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. EZET is passively managed, while NFXS is actively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -28.46% vs 64.26% for NFXS. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.

Performance

EZET vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -44.18% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.21% return.

EZET

• 1D: -4.27%
• 1M: -19.67%
• YTD: -44.18%
• 6M: -44.13%
• 1Y: -28.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFXS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 21.28%
• YTD: 24.21%
• 6M: 24.00%
• 1Y: 64.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZET vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-44.18%	-11.23%	40.71%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	24.21%	-8.56%	-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and NFXS is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.18

Return for Risk

EZET vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 6
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 6

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 55
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZET vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZET	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	1.91	-2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	2.55	-2.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.36	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	2.06	-2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	5.64	-6.34

EZET vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZET Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZET and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZET vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -67.56%, which is greater than NFXS's maximum drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and NFXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	NFXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.56%	-50.37%	-17.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.56%	-31.31%	-36.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.79%	-12.88%	-52.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.64%	-31.93%	-1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.40%	11.45%	+28.95%

Volatility

EZET vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a higher volatility of 19.85% compared to Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) at 7.74%. This indicates that EZET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZET	NFXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.85%	7.74%	+12.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.99%	26.22%	+20.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.14%	33.81%	+35.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.49%	34.65%	+37.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.49%	34.65%	+37.84%

EZET vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZET vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	3.23%	3.53%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZET and NFXS in my portfolio?

EZET and NFXS have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZET or NFXS?

EZET has higher volatility (19.85%) compared to NFXS (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -67.56% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

Which ETF is better, EZET or NFXS?

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 64.26% vs -28.46% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZET or NFXS?

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 64.26% return vs -28.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZET or NFXS?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZET or NFXS?

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between EZET and NFXS?

EZET is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 1.03% for NFXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.