EZET vs. IBLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC).
EZET and IBLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EZET is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jul 23, 2024. IBLC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2022. Both EZET and IBLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EZET vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EZET vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -27.89% | -11.23% | -3.68% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | -10.80% | 27.05% | -3.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -27.89% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's -10.80% return.
EZET
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- -27.89%
- 6M
- -50.71%
- 1Y
- 11.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- YTD
- -10.80%
- 6M
- -30.61%
- 1Y
- 50.32%
- 3Y*
- 34.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EZET vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EZET vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
EZET
IBLC
EZET vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZET | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | 0.87 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.79 | 1.50 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 1.27 | -0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 2.80 | -2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZET | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 0.87 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.33 | 0.23 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between EZET and IBLC is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EZET vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 7.07% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
EZET vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, roughly equal to the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and IBLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZET | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.05% | -62.54% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.68% | -44.94% | -16.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.80% | -41.36% | -14.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.49% | -26.02% | -4.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.61% | 20.32% | +10.29% |
Volatility
EZET vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) have volatilities of 19.05% and 18.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EZET | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.05% | 18.30% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.59% | 44.22% | +9.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.83% | 58.28% | +17.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.88% | 65.13% | +9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.88% | 65.13% | +9.75% |