EZET vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZET is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -28.46% vs 1424.52% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

EZET vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -44.18% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 968.33% return.

EZET

• 1D: -4.27%
• 1M: -19.67%
• YTD: -44.18%
• 6M: -44.13%
• 1Y: -28.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: -5.48%
• 1M: 18.43%
• YTD: 968.33%
• 6M: 944.72%
• 1Y: 1,424.52%
• 3Y*: 123.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZET vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-44.18%	-11.23%	-4.77%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	968.33%	96.22%	-41.63%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and BWET is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	-0.04

Return for Risk

EZET vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 6
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZET vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZET	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	14.65	-15.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	6.07	-6.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.87	-0.89
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	47.03	-47.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	147.28	-147.98

EZET vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZET Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 14.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZET and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZET vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -67.56%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.56%	-56.90%	-10.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.56%	-30.64%	-36.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.79%	-5.48%	-60.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.64%	-23.76%	-9.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.40%	11.60%	+28.80%

Volatility

EZET vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) is 19.85%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 26.27%. This indicates that EZET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZET	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.85%	26.27%	-6.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.99%	89.01%	-42.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.14%	98.57%	-29.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.49%	70.47%	+2.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.49%	70.47%	+2.02%

EZET vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZET vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

Neither EZET nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZET and BWET in my portfolio?

EZET and BWET have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZET or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (26.27%) compared to EZET (19.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -67.56% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, EZET or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1424.52% vs -28.46% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZET has been the lower-risk option at 19.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZET or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1424.52% return vs -28.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZET or BWET?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZET or BWET?

EZET and BWET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EZET and BWET?

EZET is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BWET is Commodities. EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.