EZET vs. BITB
EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant while BITB tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -32.57% vs -39.60% for BITB. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for BITB.
Performance
EZET vs. BITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -40.23% return, which is significantly lower than BITB's -27.44% return.
EZET
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -25.14%
- YTD
- -40.23%
- 6M
- -43.56%
- 1Y
- -32.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITB
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -22.13%
- YTD
- -27.44%
- 6M
- -31.39%
- 1Y
- -39.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZET vs. BITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -40.23% | -11.23% | -3.68% |
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF | -27.44% | -6.47% | 42.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZET and BITB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between EZET and BITB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZET vs. BITB — Risk / Return Rank
EZET
BITB
EZET vs. BITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZET | BITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.86 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | -0.80 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -1.39 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZET | BITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | -0.91 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.27 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
EZET vs. BITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, which is greater than BITB's maximum drawdown of -49.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and BITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZET | BITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.05% | -49.45% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.36% | -49.45% | -13.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.36% | -49.45% | -13.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.74% | -16.08% | -16.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.94% | 28.59% | +9.35% |
Volatility
EZET vs. BITB - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) at 9.05%. This indicates that EZET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZET | BITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | 9.05% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.32% | 33.85% | +11.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.34% | 43.66% | +24.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.29% | 49.97% | +22.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.29% | 49.97% | +22.32% |
EZET vs. BITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BITB's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EZET vs. BITB - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZET nor BITB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EZET and BITB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZET has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to BITB (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -64.05% vs BITB's -49.45%.
On 1-year performance, EZET leads with -32.57% vs -39.60% for BITB. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BITB has been the lower-risk option at 9.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EZET has performed better with a -32.57% return vs -39.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for BITB.
EZET and BITB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while BITB tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Bitwise Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.20% for BITB.
EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZET and BITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer