EZET vs. BFOC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - EZET is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. EZET is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.

Performance

EZET vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -36.99% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -6.82% return.

EZET

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 10.09%
• 6M: -18.59%
• YTD: -36.99%
• 1Y: -49.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.66%

BFOC

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: -3.48%
• YTD: -6.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	$37.66K	$47.54K	$63.36K
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	$400.33K	$484.91K	$668.91K

EZET vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-36.99%	-28.71%
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	-6.82%	-9.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and BFOC is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

EZET vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 3
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BFOC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EZET vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZET	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	—	—

Drawdowns

EZET vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -67.89%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and BFOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	BFOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.89%	-18.41%	-49.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.38%	-17.69%	-43.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.30%	-13.54%	-21.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZET	BFOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.10%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.94%	11.66%	+55.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.19%	11.66%	+59.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.19%	11.66%	+59.53%

EZET vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZET vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither EZET nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZET and BFOC in my portfolio?

EZET and BFOC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EZET or BFOC?

On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZET or BFOC?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZET or BFOC?

EZET and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EZET and BFOC?

EZET is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.90% for BFOC.