EZET vs. AETH
EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and AETH (Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZET is passively managed, while AETH is actively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -31.70% vs -16.05% for AETH. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AETH.
Performance
EZET vs. AETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -39.43% return, which is significantly lower than AETH's -9.79% return.
EZET
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 6M
- -42.74%
- 1Y
- -31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AETH
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -16.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZET vs. AETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -39.43% | -11.23% | -3.68% |
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | -9.79% | -0.11% | -5.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZET and AETH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EZET and AETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZET vs. AETH — Risk / Return Rank
EZET
AETH
EZET vs. AETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZET | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.37 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -0.52 | -0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZET | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | -0.36 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.37 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
EZET vs. AETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, which is greater than AETH's maximum drawdown of -47.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and AETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZET | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.05% | -47.78% | -16.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.87% | -43.98% | -18.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.87% | -43.85% | -19.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.67% | -24.65% | -8.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.73% | 30.86% | +6.87% |
Volatility
EZET vs. AETH - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) at 4.02%. This indicates that EZET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZET | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.88% | 4.02% | +5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.05% | 27.18% | +18.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.43% | 45.03% | +23.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.37% | 54.68% | +17.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.37% | 54.68% | +17.69% |
EZET vs. AETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AETH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZET vs. AETH - Dividend Comparison
EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | 2.67% | 2.41% | 14.73% | 6.64% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZET and AETH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZET has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to AETH (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -64.05% vs AETH's -47.78%.
On 1-year performance, AETH leads with -16.05% vs -31.70% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AETH has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AETH has performed better with a -16.05% return vs -31.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AETH.
AETH has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.90% for AETH.
AETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZET and AETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer