EZET vs. AETH
EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and AETH (Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZET is passively managed, while AETH is actively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -49.07% vs -37.78% for AETH. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for AETH.
Performance
EZET vs. AETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -36.99% return, which is significantly lower than AETH's -15.85% return.
EZET
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 10.09%
- 6M
- -18.59%
- YTD
- -36.99%
- 1Y
- -49.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.66%
AETH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- 6M
- -13.21%
- YTD
- -15.85%
- 1Y
- -37.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.80K | $18.32K | $18.15K | |
| $400.33K | $484.91K | $668.91K |
EZET vs. AETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -36.99% | -11.23% | -4.77% |
AETH Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF | -15.85% | -0.11% | -6.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZET and AETH is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EZET and AETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZET vs. AETH — Risk / Return Rank
EZET
AETH
EZET vs. AETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF (AETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZET | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.79 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.74 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | -1.04 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZET vs. AETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -67.89%, which is greater than AETH's maximum drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and AETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZET | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.89% | -51.08% | -16.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.89% | -51.08% | -16.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.38% | -47.63% | -13.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.30% | -25.99% | -9.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.69% | 36.22% | +9.47% |
Volatility
EZET vs. AETH - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF (AETH) have volatilities of 11.10% and 11.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZET | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | 11.22% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.45% | 24.81% | +18.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.94% | 41.09% | +25.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.19% | 53.60% | +17.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.19% | 53.60% | +17.59% |
EZET vs. AETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AETH's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZET vs. AETH - Dividend Comparison
EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AETH Bitwise Trendwise Ethereum and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF | 2.86% | 2.41% | 14.73% | 6.64% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZET and AETH have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AETH has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to EZET (11.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -67.89% vs AETH's -51.08%.
On 1-year performance, AETH leads with -37.78% vs -49.07% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZET has been the lower-risk option at 11.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AETH has performed better with a -37.78% return vs -49.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for AETH.
AETH has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.89% for AETH.
EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.74 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZET and AETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer