PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZET vs. AETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZET vs. AETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -39.43% return, which is significantly lower than AETH's -9.79% return.


EZET

1D
-5.67%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.43%
6M
-42.74%
1Y
-31.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AETH

1D
-0.01%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
-9.79%
6M
-15.30%
1Y
-16.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZET vs. AETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EZET
Franklin Ethereum ETF
-39.43%-11.23%-3.68%
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
-9.79%-0.11%-5.45%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and AETH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.69

The correlation between EZET and AETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZET vs. AETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZET
EZET Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

AETH
AETH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
AETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
AETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
AETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
AETH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZET vs. AETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZETAETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.96

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.37

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

-0.52

-0.32

EZET vs. AETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZET Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is comparable to the AETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZET and AETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZETAETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

-0.36

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

0.37

-0.79

Drawdowns

EZET vs. AETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, which is greater than AETH's maximum drawdown of -47.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and AETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZETAETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.05%

-47.78%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.87%

-43.98%

-18.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.87%

-43.85%

-19.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.67%

-24.65%

-8.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.73%

30.86%

+6.87%

Volatility

EZET vs. AETH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) at 4.02%. This indicates that EZET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZETAETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

4.02%

+5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.05%

27.18%

+18.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.43%

45.03%

+23.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.37%

54.68%

+17.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.37%

54.68%

+17.69%

EZET vs. AETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AETH's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZET vs. AETH - Dividend Comparison

EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
2.67%2.41%14.73%6.64%
EZET
Franklin Ethereum ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZET and AETH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZET has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to AETH (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -64.05% vs AETH's -47.78%.

On 1-year performance, AETH leads with -16.05% vs -31.70% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AETH has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AETH has performed better with a -16.05% return vs -31.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AETH.

AETH has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.90% for AETH.

AETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZET and AETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer