AETH vs. AAAU
AETH (Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF) and AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise, while AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. AETH is actively managed, while AAAU is passively managed. Over the past year, AETH returned -32.05% vs 18.63% for AAAU. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AETH charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AAAU.
Performance
AETH vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AETH achieves a -15.44% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's -7.83% return.
AETH
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- 6M
- -19.73%
- YTD
- -15.44%
- 1Y
- -32.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAU
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- 6M
- -13.69%
- YTD
- -7.83%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 26.49%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- —
AETH vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | -15.44% | -0.11% | 31.76% | 33.21% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | -7.83% | 64.06% | 26.91% | 11.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between AETH and AAAU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AETH vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank
AETH
AAAU
AETH vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AETH | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.15 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 0.71 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 1.70 | -2.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AETH vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AETH drawdown since its inception was -51.08%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -26.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AETH and AAAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AETH | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.08% | -26.29% | -24.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.08% | -26.29% | -24.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.37% | -26.29% | -21.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.61% | -6.43% | -19.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.63% | 10.99% | +23.64% |
Volatility
AETH vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 6.54%. This indicates that AETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AETH | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.54% | 6.54% | +4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.03% | 23.97% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.36% | 27.72% | +15.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.90% | 18.25% | +35.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.90% | 17.22% | +36.68% |
AETH vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AETH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
AETH vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | 2.85% | 2.41% | 14.73% | 6.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AETH and AAAU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AETH has higher volatility (10.54%) compared to AAAU (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AETH dropped -51.08% vs AAAU's -26.29%.
On 1-year performance, AAAU leads with 18.63% vs -32.05% for AETH. On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AAAU has been the lower-risk option at 6.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAAU has performed better with a 18.63% return vs -32.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AETH.
AETH has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.
AETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while AAAU is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AETH and 0.18% for AAAU.
AAAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AETH and AAAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer