PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AETH vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AETH vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AETH achieves a -9.78% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 0.05% return.


AETH

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-9.78%
6M
-12.04%
1Y
-11.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAAU

1D
-3.64%
1M
-8.21%
YTD
0.05%
6M
2.64%
1Y
30.12%
3Y*
29.80%
5Y*
17.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AETH vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
-9.78%-0.11%31.76%37.65%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
0.05%64.06%26.91%12.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AETH and AAAU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AETH vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AETH
AETH Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
AETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
AETH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
AETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
AETH Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AETH vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AETHAAAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.22

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

1.43

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

3.62

-4.04

AETH vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AETH and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AETHAAAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

1.07

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.06

-0.69

Drawdowns

AETH vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AETH drawdown since its inception was -47.78%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AETH and AAAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AETHAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.78%

-21.63%

-26.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.98%

-20.00%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.85%

-20.00%

-23.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.71%

-6.19%

-18.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.09%

7.86%

+23.23%

Volatility

AETH vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) is 3.93%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that AETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AETHAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

5.66%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.18%

23.25%

+3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.88%

26.59%

+18.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.60%

17.90%

+36.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.60%

17.04%

+37.56%

AETH vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AETH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AETH vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AETH
Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF
2.67%2.41%14.73%6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


AETH and AAAU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAAU has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to AETH (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AETH dropped -47.78% vs AAAU's -21.63%.

On 1-year performance, AAAU leads with 30.12% vs -11.35% for AETH. On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AETH has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAAU has performed better with a 30.12% return vs -11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AETH.

AETH has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.

AETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while AAAU is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AETH and 0.18% for AAAU.

AAAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AETH and AAAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer