EZA vs. TJUN
EZA (iShares MSCI South Africa ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - EZA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI South Africa Index, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
EZA vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly lower than TJUN's 5.26% return.
EZA
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -2.56%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 34.67%
- 3Y*
- 26.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
TJUN
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZA vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | -2.56% | 38.61% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 5.26% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZA and TJUN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZA vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
EZA
TJUN
EZA vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZA | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZA | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 2.48 | -2.20 |
Drawdowns
EZA vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZA | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.64% | -4.47% | -60.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.84% | -0.00% | -17.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.92% | -0.60% | -16.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.30% | — | — |
Volatility
EZA vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZA | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.03% | 7.54% | +23.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 7.54% | +21.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.37% | 7.54% | +23.83% |
EZA vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZA vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | 6.32% | 6.16% | 7.26% | 2.84% | 3.90% | 2.05% | 5.51% | 12.27% | 3.81% | 1.55% | 4.10% | 3.03% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZA and TJUN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
EZA has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
EZA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EZA and 0.95% for TJUN.
Find the right allocation for EZA and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer