EZA vs. LOGS.DE
EZA (iShares MSCI South Africa ETF) and LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EZA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI South Africa Index, while LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZA returned 8.12%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for LOGS.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EZA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LOGS.DE.
Performance
EZA vs. LOGS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EZA is traded in USD, while LOGS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LOGS.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than LOGS.DE's 28.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EZA has underperformed LOGS.DE with an annualized return of 8.12%, while LOGS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.
EZA
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 30.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- 28.22%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 58.18%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 20.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
EZA vs. LOGS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | -2.81% | 75.20% | 7.16% | 1.51% | -5.18% | 7.91% | -5.19% | 9.83% | -25.24% | 36.03% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 28.22% | 63.12% | -7.67% | 5.42% | 21.85% | 11.52% | -14.10% | 8.90% | -5.45% | 16.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZA and LOGS.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.44 |
The correlation between EZA and LOGS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZA vs. LOGS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EZA
LOGS.DE
EZA vs. LOGS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZA | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.53 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 7.13 | -5.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 26.77 | -23.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZA vs. LOGS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, smaller than the maximum LOGS.DE drawdown of -68.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and LOGS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZA | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.64% | -68.51% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.31% | -8.13% | -15.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.31% | -20.84% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.94% | -23.71% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.25% | -59.32% | -2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.05% | -6.58% | -11.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.92% | -33.07% | +16.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 2.17% | +6.76% |
Volatility
EZA vs. LOGS.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) at 6.45%. This indicates that EZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOGS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZA | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.34% | 6.45% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.03% | 14.32% | +12.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.92% | 18.10% | +13.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.86% | 23.45% | +5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.43% | 25.31% | +6.12% |
EZA vs. LOGS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than LOGS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZA vs. LOGS.DE - Dividend Comparison
EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, while LOGS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | 6.34% | 6.16% | 7.26% | 2.84% | 3.90% | 2.05% | 5.51% | 12.27% | 3.81% | 1.55% | 4.10% | 3.03% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZA and LOGS.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EZA.
EZA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LOGS.DE is Energy Equities. EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index, while LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EZA and 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
Find the right allocation for EZA and LOGS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer