EZA vs. AMEL.DE
EZA (iShares MSCI South Africa ETF) and AMEL.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - EZA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI South Africa Index, while AMEL.DE is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZA returned 8.12%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for AMEL.DE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AMEL.DE.
Performance
EZA vs. AMEL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EZA is traded in USD, while AMEL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AMEL.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than AMEL.DE's 12.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EZA having a 8.12% annualized return and AMEL.DE not far ahead at 8.40%.
EZA
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 30.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- 12.08%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 37.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
EZA vs. AMEL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | -2.81% | 75.20% | 7.16% | 1.51% | -5.18% | 7.91% | -5.19% | 9.83% | -25.24% | 36.03% |
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 12.08% | 55.85% | -26.65% | 32.20% | 9.92% | -10.88% | -13.56% | 18.15% | -7.84% | 23.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZA and AMEL.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2011 | 0.52 |
The correlation between EZA and AMEL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZA vs. AMEL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EZA
AMEL.DE
EZA vs. AMEL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZA | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.30 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.46 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 7.76 | -4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZA vs. AMEL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, roughly equal to the maximum AMEL.DE drawdown of -61.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and AMEL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZA | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.64% | -61.57% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.31% | -15.11% | -8.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.31% | -27.01% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.94% | -28.52% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.25% | -54.94% | -7.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.05% | -10.20% | -7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.92% | -26.35% | +9.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 4.81% | +4.12% |
Volatility
EZA vs. AMEL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) at 7.31%. This indicates that EZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZA | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.34% | 7.31% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.03% | 17.46% | +9.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.92% | 20.54% | +11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.86% | 22.51% | +6.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.43% | 26.29% | +5.14% |
EZA vs. AMEL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZA vs. AMEL.DE - Dividend Comparison
EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, while AMEL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | 6.34% | 6.16% | 7.26% | 2.84% | 3.90% | 2.05% | 5.51% | 12.27% | 3.81% | 1.55% | 4.10% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZA and AMEL.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EZA.
EZA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AMEL.DE is Latin America Equities. EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index, while AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EZA and 0.20% for AMEL.DE.
Find the right allocation for EZA and AMEL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer