EXUS vs. FDT
EXUS (Macquarie Focused International Core ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EXUS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
EXUS vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXUS achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 25.50% return.
EXUS
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDT
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 55.05%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
EXUS vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EXUS Macquarie Focused International Core ETF | 6.98% | 4.28% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 25.50% | 21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXUS and FDT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXUS vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
EXUS
FDT
EXUS vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Focused International Core ETF (EXUS) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXUS | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.40 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
EXUS vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXUS drawdown since its inception was -15.28%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXUS and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXUS | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -46.10% | +30.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -1.59% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -10.78% | +7.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.43% | — |
Volatility
EXUS vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXUS | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 18.42% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 18.23% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 18.52% | -0.36% |
EXUS vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXUS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXUS vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
EXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than FDT's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXUS Macquarie Focused International Core ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.84% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXUS and FDT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EXUS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EXUS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.03% for EXUS.
They also come from different issuers: Macquarie and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EXUS and 0.80% for FDT.
Find the right allocation for EXUS and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer