EXS3.DE vs. XB4A.DE
EXS3.DE (iShares MDAX UCITS ETF (DE)) and XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - EXS3.DE tracks the MDAX® while XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EXS3.DE returned 3.70%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for XB4A.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EXS3.DE charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XB4A.DE.
Performance
EXS3.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXS3.DE achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 22.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EXS3.DE has underperformed XB4A.DE with an annualized return of 3.70%, while XB4A.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.
EXS3.DE
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- 1.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- -2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.70%
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 1Y
- 45.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
EXS3.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXS3.DE iShares MDAX UCITS ETF (DE) | 3.35% | 19.10% | -6.45% | 7.92% | -29.11% | 13.18% | 8.17% | 30.28% | -18.39% | 17.41% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.80% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 32.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXS3.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EXS3.DE and XB4A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXS3.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EXS3.DE
XB4A.DE
EXS3.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS3.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EXS3.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.43 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 4.13 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | 13.97 | -13.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EXS3.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXS3.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.82%, which is greater than XB4A.DE's maximum drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXS3.DE and XB4A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXS3.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.82% | -53.54% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.62% | -10.88% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.67% | -16.26% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.31% | -32.50% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.31% | -53.54% | +13.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.77% | -3.43% | -11.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -9.88% | -4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 3.23% | +2.20% |
Volatility
EXS3.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS3.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) at 4.97%. This indicates that EXS3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXS3.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 4.97% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 14.95% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.81% | 17.66% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 19.15% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 20.15% | -1.96% |
EXS3.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXS3.DE has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXS3.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EXS3.DE nor XB4A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXS3.DE iShares MDAX UCITS ETF (DE) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.49% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXS3.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XB4A.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XB4A.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EXS3.DE.
EXS3.DE tracks MDAX®, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EXS3.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
Find the right allocation for EXS3.DE and XB4A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer