PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXS1.DE vs. FLSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EXS1.DE is traded in EUR, while FLSW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLSW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXS1.DE achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than FLSW's 2.99% return.


EXS1.DE

1D
-1.30%
1M
3.25%
YTD
0.74%
6M
4.25%
1Y
2.44%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
8.84%

FLSW

1D
-1.39%
1M
1.87%
YTD
2.99%
6M
5.70%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
8.63%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EXS1.DE
iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE)
0.74%22.63%18.07%19.45%-12.79%15.16%2.98%24.67%-14.21%
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
2.99%17.14%4.71%13.28%-13.07%29.86%3.91%34.64%-1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between EXS1.DE and FLSW is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXS1.DE vs. FLSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXS1.DE
EXS1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
EXS1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXS1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXS1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EXS1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXS1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FLSW
FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXS1.DEFLSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.15

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.97

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

3.28

-2.67

EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXS1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the FLSW Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXS1.DE and FLSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXS1.DEFLSWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

0.82

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.58

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.64

-0.42

Drawdowns

EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXS1.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXS1.DE and FLSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXS1.DEFLSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.00%

-28.67%

-39.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-11.48%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.93%

-13.81%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.69%

-18.13%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-4.60%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.04%

-4.61%

-12.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.38%

+0.61%

Volatility

EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) at 4.47%. This indicates that EXS1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXS1.DEFLSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

4.47%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

10.47%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.04%

13.63%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

13.43%

+3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

15.95%

+2.41%

EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXS1.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSW's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison

EXS1.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXS1.DE
iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.51%0.48%0.73%0.66%
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
2.08%2.12%2.04%2.36%2.02%1.86%2.28%1.15%2.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXS1.DE and FLSW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLSW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLSW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for EXS1.DE.

EXS1.DE tracks DAX®, while FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EXS1.DE and 0.09% for FLSW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXS1.DE and FLSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer