EXS1.DE vs. FLSW
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW).
EXS1.DE and FLSW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EXS1.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the DAX®. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000. FLSW is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 6, 2018. Both EXS1.DE and FLSW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EXS1.DE or FLSW.
Key characteristics
| EXS1.DE | FLSW | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.38% | 1.36% |
| 1Y Return | 21.70% | 10.73% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.32% | 0.17% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.10% | 6.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.69 | 0.90 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.32 | 1.31 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.30 | 1.15 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.48 | 0.82 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.17 | 3.52 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.23% | 3.09% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.07% | 12.12% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.30% | -28.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.98% | -9.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXS1.DE and FLSW is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EXS1.DE achieves a 14.38% return, which is significantly higher than FLSW's 1.36% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXS1.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSW's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison
EXS1.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXS1.DE iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 0.48% | 0.73% | 0.66% | 0.60% | 0.67% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.08% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXS1.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.30%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXS1.DE and FLSW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EXS1.DE vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) at 3.85%. This indicates that EXS1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.