EXS1.DE vs. SXRT.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE) and iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SXRT.DE).
EXS1.DE and SXRT.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EXS1.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the DAX®. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000. SXRT.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the EURO STOXX® 50. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both EXS1.DE and SXRT.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EXS1.DE or SXRT.DE.
Key characteristics
| EXS1.DE | SXRT.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.38% | 7.57% |
| 1Y Return | 21.70% | 13.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.32% | 5.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.10% | 7.85% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.03% | 7.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.69 | 0.94 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.32 | 1.37 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.30 | 1.17 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.48 | 1.27 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.17 | 4.32 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.23% | 2.88% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.07% | 13.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.30% | -38.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.98% | -6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXS1.DE and SXRT.DE is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EXS1.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EXS1.DE achieves a 14.38% return, which is significantly higher than SXRT.DE's 7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, EXS1.DE has underperformed SXRT.DE with an annualized return of 7.03%, while SXRT.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXS1.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXS1.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRT.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EXS1.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE) and iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SXRT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EXS1.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EXS1.DE nor SXRT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXS1.DE iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 0.48% | 0.73% | 0.66% | 0.60% | 0.67% |
SXRT.DE iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EXS1.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXS1.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.30%, which is greater than SXRT.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXS1.DE and SXRT.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EXS1.DE vs. SXRT.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE) and iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SXRT.DE) have volatilities of 5.75% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.