EXOSX vs. IVFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX).
EXOSX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Jul 9, 2002. IVFIX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Jun 3, 2008.
Performance
EXOSX vs. IVFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXOSX vs. IVFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | -7.05% | 16.21% | 3.33% | 19.89% | -24.26% | 11.50% | 27.07% | 27.52% | -17.23% | 23.92% |
IVFIX Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund | 5.22% | 31.79% | 1.91% | 11.05% | -2.54% | 11.58% | -1.74% | 20.15% | -11.96% | 14.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXOSX achieves a -7.05% return, which is significantly lower than IVFIX's 5.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EXOSX has underperformed IVFIX with an annualized return of 6.47%, while IVFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.06% annualized return.
EXOSX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -6.01%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.47%
IVFIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXOSX vs. IVFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXOSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than IVFIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXOSX vs. IVFIX — Risk / Return Rank
EXOSX
IVFIX
EXOSX vs. IVFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXOSX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.17 | 1.98 | -1.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | 2.58 | -2.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.41 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 4.08 | -3.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 17.43 | -16.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXOSX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 1.98 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.83 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.49 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.21 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXOSX and IVFIX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXOSX vs. IVFIX - Dividend Comparison
EXOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than IVFIX's 3.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | 1.22% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 0.82% | 1.85% | 0.86% | 1.72% | 0.91% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.84% |
IVFIX Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund | 3.14% | 3.37% | 4.44% | 4.01% | 3.99% | 3.67% | 3.62% | 3.98% | 4.97% | 4.17% | 3.38% | 3.95% |
Drawdowns
EXOSX vs. IVFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXOSX drawdown since its inception was -55.50%, which is greater than IVFIX's maximum drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXOSX and IVFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXOSX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.50% | -51.49% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -8.47% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.71% | -21.29% | -16.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.71% | -33.46% | -4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | -6.58% | -4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -11.69% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 1.98% | +1.07% |
Volatility
EXOSX vs. IVFIX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) at 4.54%. This indicates that EXOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXOSX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 4.54% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 8.10% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 14.63% | +1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 12.96% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 14.74% | +1.85% |