EXI vs. IFRA
EXI (iShares Global Industrials ETF) and IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds from iShares - EXI tracks the S&P Global 1200 / Industrials -SEC while IFRA tracks the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EXI returned 11.17%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for IFRA. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EXI charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IFRA.
Performance
EXI vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXI achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly lower than IFRA's 16.86% return.
EXI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 22.09%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
IFRA
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- —
EXI vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXI iShares Global Industrials ETF | 10.88% | 25.88% | 12.47% | 22.04% | -12.36% | 17.37% | 11.33% | 27.13% | -13.00% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 16.86% | 15.90% | 17.02% | 13.42% | -3.32% | 29.81% | 7.37% | 27.00% | -8.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXI and IFRA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between EXI and IFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
EXI vs. IFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EXI
IFRA
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
EXI
IFRA
Utilities
EXI
IFRA
Technology
EXI
IFRA
-
Communication Services
EXI
IFRA
-
Consumer Cyclical
EXI
IFRA
Basic Materials
EXI
IFRA
Financial Services
EXI
IFRA
-
Consumer Defensive
EXI
IFRA
Energy
EXI
-
IFRA
Healthcare
EXI
-
IFRA
-
Real Estate
EXI
-
IFRA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXI vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank
EXI
IFRA
EXI vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Industrials ETF (EXI) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXI | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.40 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.30 | 12.70 | -5.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXI | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.94 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.73 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.63 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
EXI vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXI drawdown since its inception was -62.60%, which is greater than IFRA's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXI and IFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXI | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.60% | -41.06% | -21.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.35% | -8.40% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -19.93% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.23% | -19.93% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -2.66% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.97% | -5.14% | -4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.25% | +0.78% |
Volatility
EXI vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Industrials ETF (EXI) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) at 4.89%. This indicates that EXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXI | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 4.89% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.42% | 11.32% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 14.79% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.92% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 21.38% | -2.97% |
EXI vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXI has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXI vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison
EXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than IFRA's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXI iShares Global Industrials ETF | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.84% | 1.63% | 1.42% | 1.26% | 1.72% | 2.21% | 1.48% | 1.75% | 1.95% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.59% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXI and IFRA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EXI has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to IFRA (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXI dropped -62.60% vs IFRA's -41.06%.
On 5-year performance, IFRA leads with 13.03% vs 11.17% for EXI. On fees, IFRA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IFRA has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFRA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for EXI.
IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.19% for EXI.
EXI tracks S&P Global 1200 / Industrials -SEC, while IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for EXI and 0.30% for IFRA.
IFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EXI and IFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer