EXI vs. FIDU
EXI (iShares Global Industrials ETF) and FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - EXI tracks the S&P Global 1200 / Industrials -SEC while FIDU tracks the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EXI returned 13.04%/yr vs 14.77%/yr for FIDU. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EXI charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FIDU.
Performance
EXI vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXI achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than FIDU's 17.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EXI has underperformed FIDU with an annualized return of 13.04%, while FIDU has yielded a comparatively higher 14.77% annualized return.
EXI
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- 23.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
FIDU
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 17.16%
- 6M
- 15.32%
- 1Y
- 28.52%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.77%
EXI vs. FIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXI iShares Global Industrials ETF | 12.18% | 25.88% | 12.47% | 22.04% | -12.36% | 17.37% | 11.33% | 27.13% | -14.41% | 25.16% |
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 17.16% | 18.61% | 16.51% | 22.62% | -8.36% | 20.96% | 13.72% | 30.69% | -13.85% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXI and FIDU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.92 |
The correlation between EXI and FIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
EXI vs. FIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EXI
FIDU
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
EXI
FIDU
Technology
EXI
FIDU
Utilities
EXI
FIDU
Communication Services
EXI
FIDU
Consumer Cyclical
EXI
FIDU
Basic Materials
EXI
FIDU
Financial Services
EXI
FIDU
Consumer Defensive
EXI
FIDU
-
Energy
EXI
-
FIDU
Healthcare
EXI
-
FIDU
Real Estate
EXI
-
FIDU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXI vs. FIDU — Risk / Return Rank
EXI
FIDU
EXI vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Industrials ETF (EXI) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EXI | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.34 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.68 | 9.63 | -1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EXI vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXI drawdown since its inception was -62.60%, which is greater than FIDU's maximum drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXI and FIDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXI | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.60% | -42.31% | -20.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.35% | -12.23% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -20.52% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.23% | -22.87% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.56% | -42.31% | +2.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -2.11% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -4.79% | -5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.97% | +0.13% |
Volatility
EXI vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Industrials ETF (EXI) is 6.03%, while Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that EXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXI | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 6.54% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 14.32% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 17.40% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 18.40% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 20.34% | -1.98% |
EXI vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXI has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXI vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison
EXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than FIDU's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXI iShares Global Industrials ETF | 1.08% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.84% | 1.63% | 1.42% | 1.26% | 1.72% | 2.21% | 1.48% | 1.75% | 1.95% |
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.63% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EXI and FIDU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIDU has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to EXI (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXI dropped -62.60% vs FIDU's -42.31%.
On 10-year performance, FIDU leads with 14.77% vs 13.04% for EXI. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 14.77% return vs 13.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for EXI.
EXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.94% for FIDU.
EXI tracks S&P Global 1200 / Industrials -SEC, while FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for EXI and 0.08% for FIDU.
FIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EXI and FIDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer