PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXG vs. EHSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXG vs. EHSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXG achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than EHSTX's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EXG has underperformed EHSTX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while EHSTX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.


EXG

1D
-1.25%
1M
1.88%
YTD
2.69%
6M
7.01%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
10.39%

EHSTX

1D
0.64%
1M
3.92%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.35%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXG vs. EHSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXG
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund
2.69%27.79%16.04%11.46%-22.24%31.53%10.19%28.71%-12.09%29.58%
EHSTX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund
12.24%12.11%11.25%7.93%-2.80%24.25%2.29%30.84%-6.96%14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EXG and EHSTX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2007

0.69

The correlation between EXG and EHSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXG vs. EHSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXG
EXG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

EHSTX
EHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXG vs. EHSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXGEHSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.92

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

11.82

-5.60

EXG vs. EHSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the EHSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXG and EHSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXGEHSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.17

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.63

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.63

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.53

-0.22

Drawdowns

EXG vs. EHSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXG drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than EHSTX's maximum drawdown of -53.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXG and EHSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXGEHSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-53.47%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.28%

-8.29%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-16.44%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.82%

-16.44%

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.36%

-39.30%

-6.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.53%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-7.40%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.04%

+1.08%

Volatility

EXG vs. EHSTX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) at 3.37%. This indicates that EXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXGEHSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

3.37%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

8.31%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

11.16%

+2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

14.74%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

17.28%

+2.71%

EXG vs. EHSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than EHSTX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXG vs. EHSTX - Dividend Comparison

EXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than EHSTX's 5.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EHSTX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund
5.42%6.12%4.03%2.93%4.25%7.32%1.94%2.76%10.94%5.88%1.33%11.02%
EXG
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund
8.34%8.27%9.27%8.60%10.59%7.27%8.43%8.42%12.23%9.84%12.16%11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXG and EHSTX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to EHSTX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXG dropped -58.45% vs EHSTX's -53.47%.

EHSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXG and EHSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer