PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXEYX vs. MNDFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXEYX vs. MNDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXEYX achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than MNDFX's 11.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EXEYX has outperformed MNDFX with an annualized return of 12.78%, while MNDFX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.


EXEYX

1D
0.70%
1M
0.98%
YTD
0.49%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
12.78%

MNDFX

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
11.68%
6M
10.78%
1Y
26.97%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
5.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXEYX vs. MNDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXEYX
Manning & Napier Equity Series
0.49%8.77%15.87%24.52%-19.51%25.41%23.74%33.64%-3.94%28.89%
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
11.68%15.76%11.60%5.64%-4.22%22.45%2.44%-28.95%-4.30%23.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EXEYX and MNDFX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2008

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between EXEYX and MNDFX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXEYX vs. MNDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXEYX
EXEYX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EXEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
EXEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

MNDFX
MNDFX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MNDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MNDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXEYX vs. MNDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX) and Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXEYXMNDFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.42

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

4.09

-3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

14.58

-12.54

EXEYX vs. MNDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXEYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the MNDFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXEYX and MNDFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXEYX vs. MNDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXEYX drawdown since its inception was -54.49%, smaller than the maximum MNDFX drawdown of -62.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXEYX and MNDFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXEYXMNDFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.49%

-62.03%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-6.70%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.43%

-16.04%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-17.87%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.30%

-62.03%

+29.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-2.55%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-11.98%

+4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

1.88%

+3.07%

Volatility

EXEYX vs. MNDFX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) at 3.38%. This indicates that EXEYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXEYXMNDFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

3.38%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

8.15%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.00%

11.54%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

14.51%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

21.68%

-3.71%

EXEYX vs. MNDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXEYX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than MNDFX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXEYX vs. MNDFX - Dividend Comparison

EXEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.21%, more than MNDFX's 8.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXEYX
Manning & Napier Equity Series
11.21%11.26%11.88%3.11%13.28%16.60%8.31%10.39%20.49%7.57%4.98%44.53%
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
8.80%9.64%10.46%7.81%9.77%7.31%1.93%5.18%15.02%24.95%4.89%15.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXEYX and MNDFX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXEYX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to MNDFX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXEYX dropped -54.49% vs MNDFX's -62.03%.

MNDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXEYX and MNDFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer